FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   2181   2182   2183   2184   2185   2186   2187  
2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   >>   >|  
point. Alluding to that instrument, in the Virginia convention, he said:-- "Another clause _secures us that property which we now possess_. At present, if any slave elopes to any of those States where slaves are free, _he becomes emancipated by their laws_; for the laws of the States are _uncharitable_ (!) to one another in this respect; but in this constitution, 'No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.' THIS CLAUSE WAS EXPRESSLY INSERTED TO ENABLE OWNERS OF SLAVES TO RECLAIM THEM. _This is a better security than any that now exists_. No power is given to the general government to interpose with respect to the property in slaves now held by the States." In the same convention, alluding to the same clause, Gov. RANDOLPH said:-- "Every one knows that slaves are held to service or labor. And, when authority is given to owners of slaves to _vindicate their property_, can it be supposed they can be deprived of it? If a citizen of this State, in consequence of this clause, can take his runaway slave in Maryland, can it be seriously thought that, after taking him and bringing him home, he could be made free?" It is objected, that slaves are held as property, and therefore, as the clause refers to persons, it cannot mean slaves. But this is criticism against fact. Slaves are recognized not merely as property, but also as persons--as having a mixed character--as combining the human with the brutal. This is paradoxical, we admit; but slavery is a paradox--the American Constitution is a paradox--the American Union is a paradox--the American Government is a paradox; and if any one of these is to be repudiated on that ground, they all are. That it is the duty of the friends of freedom to deny the binding authority of them all, and to secede from them all, we distinctly affirm. After the independence of this country had been achieved, the voice of God exhorted the people, saying, "Execute true judgment, and show mercy and compassion, every man to his brother: and oppress not the widow, nor the fatherless, the stranger, nor the poor; and let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart. But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   2181   2182   2183   2184   2185   2186   2187  
2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slaves

 

property

 
paradox
 

clause

 

service

 

States

 

American

 

brother

 

authority

 

consequence


respect

 

convention

 

persons

 

friends

 

repudiated

 

criticism

 
ground
 

Government

 

slavery

 

brutal


freedom

 

combining

 

paradoxical

 

Constitution

 
Slaves
 

character

 

recognized

 
imagine
 

stranger

 
oppress

fatherless
 
shoulder
 

stopped

 

pulled

 

refused

 

hearken

 

compassion

 
independence
 
country
 

affirm


binding

 
secede
 
distinctly
 

achieved

 

refers

 

judgment

 
Execute
 

exhorted

 

people

 

discharged