FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2113   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137  
2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   >>   >|  
ut refused to consider them in the same light, when advantages were to be conferred? Might not some surprise also be expressed, that those who reproach the Southern States with the barbarous policy of considering as property a part of their human brethren, should themselves contend, that the government to which all the States are to be parties, ought to consider this unfortunate race more completely in the unnatural light of property, than the very laws of which they complain? It may be replied, perhaps, that slaves are not included in the estimate of representatives in any of the States possessing them. They neither vote themselves, nor increase the votes of their masters. Upon what principle, then, ought they to be taken into the Federal estimate of representation? In rejecting them altogether, the Constitution would, in this respect, have followed the very laws which have been appealed to the proper guide. This objection is repelled by a single observation. It is a fundamental principle of the proposed Constitution, that as the aggregate number of representatives allotted to the several States is to be determined by a Federal rule, founded on the aggregate number of inhabitants; so, the right of choosing this allotted number in each State, is to be exercised by such part of the inhabitants, as the State itself may designate. The qualifications on which the right of suffrage depends, are not perhaps the same in any two States. In some of the States the difference is very material. In every State, a certain proportion of inhabitants are deprived of this right by the Constitution of the State, who will be included in the census by which the Federal Constitution apportions the representatives. In this point of view, the Southern States might retort the complaint, by insisting, that the principle laid down by the convention required that no regard should be had to the policy of particular States towards their own inhabitants; and consequently, that the slaves, as inhabitants, should have been admitted into the census according to their full number, in like manner with other inhabitants, who, by the policy of other States, are not admitted to all the rights of citizens. A rigorous adherence, however, to this principle is waived by those who would be gainers by it. All that they ask, is that equal moderation be shown on the other side. Let the case of the slaves be considered, as it is in truth, a peculiar one. Let th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2113   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137  
2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

inhabitants

 
Constitution
 

number

 

principle

 

Federal

 

representatives

 

slaves

 

policy

 

included


estimate

 

admitted

 

census

 

property

 

aggregate

 

allotted

 
Southern
 

complaint

 

retort

 

insisting


regard

 

convention

 

required

 

apportions

 
difference
 

material

 

depends

 
qualifications
 

suffrage

 
brethren

deprived
 
proportion
 

moderation

 

gainers

 

peculiar

 

considered

 

waived

 
manner
 
rigorous
 

adherence


citizens

 
rights
 
exercised
 

masters

 

increase

 

reproach

 
rejecting
 

altogether

 

conferred

 

representation