FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155  
2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   >>   >|  
effect do these men suppose will arise from their exertions? Will a duty of ten dollars diminish the importation? Will the treatment be better than usual? I apprehend it will not, nay, it may be worse. Because an interference with the subject may excite a great degree of restlessness in the minds of those it is intended to serve, and that may be a cause for the masters to use more rigor towards them, than they would otherwise exert; so that these men seem to overshoot their object. But if they will endeavor to procure the abolition of the slave trade, let them prefer their petitions to the State legislatures, who alone have the power of forbidding the importation; I believe their applications there would be improper; but if they are any where proper, it is there. I look upon the address then to be ill-judged, however good the intention of the framers. Mr. SMITH (of S.C.) claimed it as a right, that the petition should lay over till to-morrow. Mr. BOUDINOT (of N.J.) said it was not unusual to commit petitions on the day they were presented; and the rules of the house admitted the practice, by the qualification which followed the positive order, that petitions should not be decided on the day they were first read, "unless where the house shall direct otherwise." Mr. SMITH (of S.C.) declared his intention of calling the yeas and nays, if gentlemen persisted in pressing the question. Mr. CLYMER (of Penn.) hoped the motion would be withdrawn for the present, and the business taken up in course to-morrow; because, though he respected the memorialists, he also respected order and the situation of the members. Mr. FITZSIMONS (of Penn.) did not recollect whether he moved or seconded the motion, but if he had, he should not withdraw it on account of the threat of calling the yeas and nays. Mr. BALDWIN (of Ga.) hoped the business would be conducted with temper and moderation, and that gentlemen would concede and pass the subject over for a day at least. Mr. SMITH (of S.C.) had no idea of holding out a threat to any gentleman. If the declaration of an intention to call the yeas and nays was viewed by gentlemen in that light, he would withdraw that call. Mr. WHITE (of Va.) hereupon withdrew his motion. And the address was ordered to lie on the table. FEBRUARY 12th, 1790. The following memorial was presented and read: "To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States: The memorial of the Pen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155  
2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 
gentlemen
 

petitions

 

intention

 

respected

 

withdraw

 

threat

 

business

 

address

 

morrow


presented

 

memorial

 

importation

 

subject

 

calling

 

pressing

 

decided

 

question

 

persisted

 

withdrawn


declared

 

present

 

direct

 

CLYMER

 

conducted

 

withdrew

 

ordered

 

declaration

 
viewed
 

FEBRUARY


Representatives

 

United

 
States
 

Senate

 

gentleman

 

seconded

 

recollect

 

situation

 

members

 

FITZSIMONS


account

 

BALDWIN

 
holding
 

temper

 

moderation

 
concede
 

memorialists

 

petition

 

masters

 
intended