FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132  
2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   >>   >|  
s of the slaves in the Southern States are to be rated in the apportioning of taxes. But the principle objection is, that no duties are laid on shipping--that in fact the carrying trade was to be vested in a great measure in the Americans; that the shipbuilding business was principally carried on in the Northern States. When this subject is duly considered, the Southern States, should be the last to object to it. Mr. RUTLEDGE then went into a consideration of the subject; after which the house adjourned. Gen. CHARLES COTESWORTH PINCKNEY. We were at a loss for some time for a role to ascertain the proportionate wealth of the States, at last we thought that the productive labor of the inhabitants was the best rule for ascertaining their wealth; in conformity to this rule, joined to a spirit of concession, we determined that representatives should be apportioned among the several States, by adding to the whole number of free persons three-fifths of the slaves. We thus obtained a representation for our property, and I confess I did not expect that we had conceded too much to the Eastern States, when they allowed us a representation for a species of property which they have not among them. The honorable gentleman alleges, that the Southern States are weak, I sincerely agree with him--we are so weak that by ourselves we could not form an union strong enough for the purpose of effectually protecting each other. Without union with the other States, South Carolina must soon fall. Is there any one among us so much a Quixotte as to suppose that this State could long maintain her independence if she stood alone, or was only connected with the Southern States? I scarcely believe there is. Let an invading power send a naval force into the Chesapeake to keep Virginia in alarm, and attack South Carolina with such a naval and military force as Sir Henry Clinton brought here in 1780, and though they might not soon conquer us, they would certainly do us an infinite deal of mischief; and if they considerably increased their numbers, we should probably fall. As, from the nature of our climate, and the fewness of our inhabitants, we are undoubtedly weak, should we not endeavor to form a close union with the Eastern States, who are strong? For who have been the greatest sufferers in the Union, by our obtaining our independence? I answer, the Eastern States; they have lost every thing but their country, and their freedom. It is notoriou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132  
2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
Southern
 

Eastern

 

representation

 

inhabitants

 

property

 

wealth

 

independence

 

strong

 

Carolina


slaves

 

subject

 

invading

 

connected

 

scarcely

 

Chesapeake

 

military

 

attack

 

Virginia

 

principle


objection

 

duties

 

Quixotte

 

apportioning

 

maintain

 

suppose

 

Clinton

 

greatest

 
sufferers
 

fewness


undoubtedly

 

endeavor

 
obtaining
 

country

 

freedom

 

notoriou

 

answer

 

climate

 

nature

 

conquer


Without

 

brought

 
infinite
 

numbers

 

increased

 
mischief
 

considerably

 

protecting

 

concession

 
determined