education, which has been so long neglected, and
which I have endeavored to enforce in the "New Education." The
structure and functions of the brain demonstrate that its love
region is the chief support of its life, that it supports both
will and intelligence, and that it not only sustains the highest
health of him in whom it is developed and exercised, but
ministers also to the health of all whom he meets, and is the
great healing power in those whose presence or touch relieves
the sick. The existence of this beneficent power in the human
constitution, more restorative and pleasant than all medicines
when present in sufficient fulness, is rapidly becoming known
throughout our country, and is made intelligible as to its
origin, nature and application by Sarcognomy, as I am teaching
in the College of Therapeutics. Medical colleges, in their
ignorance and jealousy, unwisely exclude and war against this
nobler and more ethical method of healing, thus compelling its
development and practice as a distinct profession, which is
rapidly undermining their influence and diminishing their
patronage by showing that, in many cases where drug remedies
have totally failed as applied by colleges, the psycho-dynamic
faculty of man may accomplish wonders.]

MISCELLANEOUS INTELLIGENCE.

RELIGION AND SCIENCE are exceedingly harmonious in assisting each
other, but theologians and scientists are exceedingly discordant. Who
is in fault? It is the fault of both. Both are bigoted and
narrow-minded. Neither can see the truths that belong to the other
party; theologians dislike science, not being able to see that science
is a grander and more unquestionable revelation than any they have
derived from tradition, and scientists deride religion and theology,
not being able in their narrowness to recognize the higher forms of
science in the great spiritual truths which have been apparent to all
races from the most ancient limits of history. Of the scientific class
the majority are averse to the religion of the times, partly from
their own sceptical nature, and partly because religion has been
presented in the repulsive forms of an absurd theology.

Prof. E. S. Morse, the president of the American Association, is a
very sceptical agnostic.

Proud Huxley's the Prince of Agnostics, you see,
And Huxley and I do sweetly agree.

At the late meeting of the Asso