FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286  
287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   >>   >|  
in the endoderm, while still others, and among them Haeckel, considered that part of it came from the ectoderm and part from the endoderm (pp. 23-4, 1874). The solution of the problem came from those observations on the development of the lower forms to which we have just alluded. The early history of these discoveries and of the theory which grew out of them has been well summarised by Lankester,[446] and may conveniently be given in his own words:-- "As far back as 1864 Alexander Agassiz ("Embryology of the Star-fish," in _Contributions to the Natural History of the United States_, vol. v., 1864) showed in his account of the development of Echinoderma that the great body-cavity of those animals developed as a pouch-like outgrowth of the archenteron of the embryo, whilst a second outgrowth gave rise to their ambulacral system; and in 1869 Metschnikoff (_Mem. de l'Acad. imperiale des Sciences de St Petersbourg_, series vii., vol. xiv., 1869), confirmed the observations of Agassiz, and showed that in Tornaria (the larva of Balanoglossus) a similar formation of body-cavities by pouch-like outgrowths of the archenteron took place. Metschnikoff has further the credit of having, in 1874 (_Zeitsch. wiss. Zoologie_, vol. xxiv., p. 15, 1874), revived Leuckart's theory of the relationship of the coelenteric apparatus of the Enterocoela to the digestive canal and body-cavities of the higher animals. Leuckart had in 1848 maintained that the alimentary canal and the body-cavity of higher animals were united in one system of cavities in the Enterocoela (_Verwandschaftsverhaeltnisse der wirbellosen Thiere_, Brunswick, 1848). Metschnikoff insisted upon such a correspondence when comparing the Echinoderm larva, with its still continuous enteron and coelom, to a Ctenophor, with its permanently continuous system of cavities and canals. Kowalevsky, in 1871, showed that the body-cavity of Sagitta was formed by a division of the archenteron into three parallel cavities, and in 1874 demonstrated the same fact for the Brachiopoda. In 1875 (_Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci._, vol. xv., p. 52) Huxley proposed to distinguish three kinds of body-cavity: the schizocoel, formed by the splitting of the mesoblast, as in the chick's blastoderm; the enterocoel, formed by pouching of the archenteron, as in Echinoderms, Sagitta and Brachiopoda; and the epicoel.... Immediately after this I put forward the theory of the uniformity of origin of the coelom as a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286  
287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

cavities

 

cavity

 
archenteron
 

theory

 
animals
 

Metschnikoff

 

system

 
showed
 

formed

 

continuous


Sagitta

 

Agassiz

 

Brachiopoda

 
outgrowth
 

endoderm

 

Enterocoela

 
Leuckart
 

higher

 

coelom

 

development


observations
 

Verwandschaftsverhaeltnisse

 
origin
 
wirbellosen
 

mesoblast

 
Immediately
 

correspondence

 

insisted

 

Thiere

 

Brunswick


united

 

pouching

 

relationship

 
enterocoel
 

revived

 

epicoel

 

coelenteric

 

apparatus

 

maintained

 

alimentary


uniformity

 

digestive

 
blastoderm
 

splitting

 

Zoologie

 

division

 

Kowalevsky

 

demonstrated

 

parallel

 
canals