FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316  
317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   >>   >|  
eriments on the frog's egg (in the _Schles. Gesell. f. vaterl. Kultur_, 15th Feb. 1884), also the important researches of M. Nussbaum and Gruber (followed up later by Verworn, Hofer and Balbiani) on Protozoa, and other experimental work" (pp. xi.-xii.). In 1888 appeared a famous paper by W. Roux,[489] in which he described how he had succeeded in killing by means of a hot needle one of the two first blastomeres of the frog's egg, and how a half-embryo had developed from the uninjured cell. Some years before[490] he had enunciated, at about the same time as Weismann, the view that development was brought about by a qualitative division of the germ-plasm contained in the nucleus, and that the complicated process of karyokinetic or mitotic division of the nucleus was essentially adapted to this end. He conceived that development proceeded by a mosaic-like distribution of potencies to the segmentation-cells, that, for instance, the first segmentation furrow separated off the material and potencies for the right half of the embryo from those for the left half. He had tried to show experimentally that the first furrow in the frog's egg coincided with the sagittal plane of the embryo,[491] and his later success in obtaining a half-embryo from one of the first two blastomeres seemed to establish the "mosaic theory" conclusively. Roux's needle-experiment aroused much interest, especially as Weismann's theory of heredity was then being keenly discussed. Chabry had published in 1887 some interesting results on the Ascidian egg,[492] which strongly supported the Roux-Weismann theory. Considerable astonishment was therefore caused by Driesch's announcement in 1891[493] that he had obtained complete larvae from single blastomeres of the sea-urchin's egg isolated at the two-celled stage. He followed this up in the next year[493] by showing that whole embryos could be produced from one or more blastomeres isolated at the four-cell stage. Similar or even more striking results were obtained by E. B. Wilson on _Amphioxus_,[494] and Zoja on medusae.[495] Driesch succeeded also in disturbing the normal course and order of segmentation by compressing the eggs of the sea-urchin between glass plates, and yet obtained normal embryos. Similar pressure-experiments were carried out on the frog by O. Hertwig,[496] and on _Nereis_ by E. B. Wilson,[497] with analogous results. In 1895 O. Schultze[498] showed that if the frog's egg is held between
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316  
317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

embryo

 

blastomeres

 
results
 

theory

 
obtained
 

segmentation

 

Weismann

 
needle
 

development

 

furrow


normal

 

Driesch

 

Wilson

 
succeeded
 

potencies

 

urchin

 
mosaic
 

isolated

 

embryos

 

nucleus


division
 

Similar

 
celled
 
larvae
 

complete

 
single
 

caused

 

Chabry

 

published

 

discussed


keenly

 

heredity

 

interesting

 
Schles
 

announcement

 

astonishment

 

Considerable

 

Ascidian

 

strongly

 

supported


eriments

 

Hertwig

 
carried
 

experiments

 

plates

 

pressure

 

Nereis

 

showed

 

analogous

 
Schultze