FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345  
346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>  
as in the case of the bears, of herbivorous adaptation, as in the case of the horses, or myrmecophagous adaptation, as in the case of the anteaters, are all secondary" (_loc. cit._, pp. 23-4). We have now reached the end of our historical survey of the problems of form. What the future course of morphology will be no one can say. But one may hazard the opinion that the present century will see a return to a simpler and more humble attitude towards the great and unsolved problems of animal form. Dogmatic materialism and dogmatic theories of evolution have in the past tended to blind us to the complexity and mysteriousness of vital phenomena. We need to look at living things with new eyes and a truer sympathy. We shall then see them as active, living, passionate beings like ourselves, and we shall seek in our morphology to interpret as far as may be their form in terms of their activity. This is what Aristotle tried to do, and a succession of master-minds after him. We shall do well to get all the help from them we can. [519] See E. B. Wilson's masterly book, _The Cell in Development and Inheritance_, New York and London, 1900. [520] _Q.J.M.S._, xxvi. 1886. [521] _Wood's Holl Biological Lectures_ for 1893. [522] _Arch. f. Ent.-Mech._, i., pp. 380-90, 1895. [523] _Beitraege zur Kritik der Darwinschen Lehre_, Leipzig, 1898. [524] See E. B. Wilson, "The Embryological Criterion of Homology," _Wood's Holl Biological Lectures_, Boston, pp. 101-24, 1895; Braem, _Biol. Centrblt._, xv., 1895; T. H. Morgan, _Arch. f. Ent.-Mech._, xviii.; J. W. Jenkinson, _Mem. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc._, 1906, and _Vertebrate Embryology_, Oxford, 1913; A. Sedgwick, article "Embryology" in _Ency. Brit._, p. 318, vol. xi., 11th Ed. (1910). [525] For a detailed treatment of this important point see the remarkable volume of E. Schulz (Petrograd), _Prinzipien der rationellen vergleichenden Embryologie_, Leipzig, 1910. [526] "La Poecilogonie," _Bull. Sci. France et Belgique_, xxxix., pp. 153-87, 1905. [527] _Un probleme de l'evolution. La loi biogenetique fondamentale_, Paris and Montpellier, 1908. [528] _Vergleichung des Entwickelungsgrades der Organe zu verschiedenen Entwickelungszeiten bei Wirbeltieren_, Jena, 1891. [529] Quoted by Keibel, _Ergebn. Anat. Entwick._, vii., p. 741. [530] "Studien zur Entw
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345  
346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>  



Top keywords:

living

 

evolution

 
Wilson
 

Embryology

 

adaptation

 
Lectures
 
Biological
 
Leipzig
 

morphology

 

problems


Vertebrate
 

Sedgwick

 

Oxford

 
article
 
Centrblt
 
Homology
 
Criterion
 

Boston

 

Embryological

 
Kritik

Darwinschen

 

Jenkinson

 

Manchester

 

Morgan

 

Petrograd

 
Organe
 

Entwickelungsgrades

 

verschiedenen

 

Entwickelungszeiten

 

Vergleichung


fondamentale

 

biogenetique

 
Montpellier
 

Wirbeltieren

 

Entwick

 

Studien

 

Ergebn

 
Quoted
 

Keibel

 

Schulz


volume

 

Prinzipien

 

rationellen

 

Embryologie

 

vergleichenden

 
remarkable
 
detailed
 

treatment

 

important

 

Poecilogonie