FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  
grace brought no submission, the British fleet opened fire at 7 A.M. The ensuing action is of great interest as being one of the very few cases in modern warfare where ships have successfully encountered modern forts. The seeming helplessness of the British unarmoured ships before Cronstadt during the Crimean War, their failure before the forts of Sevastopol, and the uselessness of the French navy during the war of 1870, had spread the notion that warships could not overpower modern fortifications. Probably this impression lay at the root of Arabi's defiance. He had some grounds for confidence. The British fleet consisted of eight battleships (of which only the _Inflexible_ and _Alexandra_ were of great fighting power), along with five unarmoured vessels. The forts mounted 33 rifled muzzle-loading guns, 3 rifled breech-loaders, and 120 old smooth-bores. The advantage in gun-power lay with the ships, especially as the sailors were by far the better marksmen. Yet so great is the superiority of forts over ships that the engagement lasted five hours or more (7 A.M. till noon) before most of the forts were silenced more or less completely. Fort Pharos continued to fire till 4 P.M. On the whole, the Egyptian gunners stood manfully to their guns. Considering the weight of metal thrown against the forts, namely, 1741 heavy projectiles and 1457 light, the damage done to them was not great, only 27 cannon being silenced completely, and 5 temporarily. On the other hand, the ships were hit only 75 times and lost only 6 killed and 27 wounded. The results show that the comparatively distant cannonades of to-day, even with great guns, are far less deadly than the old sea-fights when ships were locked yard-arm to yard-arm. [Illustration: BATTLE OF ALEXANDRIA (BOMBARDMENT OF, 1882).] Had Admiral Seymour at once landed a force of marines and bluejackets, all the forts would probably have been surrendered at once. For some reason not fully known, this was not done. Spasmodic firing began again in the morning, but a truce was before long arranged, which proved to be only a device for enabling Arabi and his troops to escape. The city, meanwhile, was the scene of a furious outbreak against Europeans, in which some 400 or 500 persons perished. Damage, afterwards assessed at L7,000,000, was done by fire and pillage. It was not till the 14th that the admiral, after receiving reinforcements, felt able to send troops into the city, when a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

modern

 

British

 
rifled
 

troops

 

completely

 

silenced

 
unarmoured
 
marines
 

BATTLE

 

Illustration


opened
 
bluejackets
 
ALEXANDRIA
 

Seymour

 

landed

 

Admiral

 
locked
 

BOMBARDMENT

 

submission

 

killed


wounded

 

temporarily

 

results

 

deadly

 

fights

 

comparatively

 

distant

 

cannonades

 

ensuing

 

Damage


perished

 

assessed

 

persons

 

furious

 

outbreak

 
Europeans
 
pillage
 

reinforcements

 

receiving

 

admiral


firing
 
morning
 

Spasmodic

 

surrendered

 

reason

 

escape

 
brought
 

enabling

 
device
 

arranged