FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  
1383; in _Lightfoot_, _disquis. chorog. Johan. praem. opp._ II., 578 sqq.; _Eisenmenger_, I., p. 3139. It is true, _Gieseler_ (on Matth. ii. 23, and in the _Studien u. Kritiken_, 1831, III. S. 591) has tried to give a different interpretation to this appellation. He is of opinion that this appellation has reference to Is. xi. 1; that it had come to the Jews from the Christians, who called [Pg 107] their Messiah [Hebrew: bN ncr], because He was He who had been promised by Isaiah. But this supposition is correct thus far only, that, no doubt, this appellation was chosen by the Jews with a reference to the circumstance that the Christians maintained that Jesus was the [Hebrew: ncr] announced by Isaiah, just as, for the very same reason, they also assign to Him the names [Hebrew: ncr napvP] "adulterous branch," and [Hebrew: ncr nteb] "abominable branch" (from Is. xiv. 19); comp. _Eisenmenger_ I. S. 137, 138. But _Gieseler_ is wrong in deriving, from this reference to Is. xi. 1, the origin of the appellation, be it properly or mainly only. Against that even the very appellation is decisive, for in that case it ought to have been _Nezer_ only, and not _Ben-Nezer_. _Gieseler_, it is true, asserts that he in whom a certain prophecy was fulfilled is called the "Son of the prophecy," and in confirmation of this _usus loquendi_ he refers to the circumstance that the pseudo-Messiah under Hadrian assumed, with a reference to the [Hebrew: kvkb] in Numb. xxiv. 17, the name [Hebrew: bN kvkb] or [Hebrew: bN kvkba], in so far as the star there promised had appeared in him. But this confirmation is only apparent; it can as little be proved from it, that Christ could be called _Ben-Nezer_ because He was He in whom the prophecy of the _Nezer_ was fulfilled, as it can be proved from the appellation _Ben Nezer_ that that pseudo-Messiah could be called _Bar Cochba_, only because it was believed that in him the prophecy of the star was fulfilled. _Reland_ has already proved (Geogr. II. p. 727) that _Barcochba_ probably had that name because he was a native of Cocab, a town or district in the country beyond Jordan. And the reason why he laid such special stress upon that descent was, that he sought a deeper meaning in this agreement of the name of his birth-place with the designation of the subject of the prophecy in Numb. xxiv. Moreover the supposition that, by the Jews, he in whom some prophecy was fulfilled, was called the son of that prophec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hebrew

 

appellation

 

prophecy

 
called
 

fulfilled

 
reference
 

Messiah

 

proved

 
Gieseler
 
circumstance

reason

 

promised

 
Christians
 
Isaiah
 
supposition
 

confirmation

 

pseudo

 

Eisenmenger

 

branch

 
refers

loquendi

 
appeared
 

Hadrian

 

apparent

 

assumed

 

Barcochba

 
deeper
 
meaning
 

agreement

 

sought


descent

 

special

 

stress

 

prophec

 

Moreover

 

subject

 

designation

 
Reland
 

Cochba

 

believed


native
 

Jordan

 
country
 
district
 
Christ
 

Kritiken

 

interpretation

 
opinion
 
correct
 

Studien