FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419  
420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   >>   >|  
gnifies mortification of the flesh, if we mortify the ill-deeds of the flesh by refraining from them." _______________________ QUESTION 37 OF CHRIST'S CIRCUMCISION, AND OF THE OTHER LEGAL OBSERVANCES ACCOMPLISHED IN REGARD TO THE CHILD CHRIST (In Four Articles) We must now consider Christ's circumcision. And since the circumcision is a kind of profession of observing the Law, according to Gal. 5:3: "I testify . . . to every man circumcising himself that he is a debtor to do the whole Law," we shall have at the same time to inquire about the other legal observances accomplished in regard to the Child Christ. Therefore there are four points of inquiry: (1) His circumcision; (2) The imposition of His name; (3) His presentation; (4) His Mother's purification. _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 37, Art. 1] Whether Christ Should Have Been Circumcised? Objection 1: It would seem that Christ should not have been circumcised. For on the advent of the reality, the figure ceases. But circumcision was prescribed to Abraham as a sign of the covenant concerning his posterity, as may be seen from Gen. 17. Now this covenant was fulfilled in Christ's birth. Therefore circumcision should have ceased at once. Obj. 2: Further, "every action of Christ is a lesson to us" [*Innoc. III, Serm. xxii de Temp.]; wherefore it is written (John 3:15): "I have given you an example, that as I have done to you, so you do also." But we ought not to be circumcised; according to Gal. 5:2: "If you be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." Therefore it seems that neither should Christ have been circumcised. Obj. 3: Further, circumcision was prescribed as a remedy of original sin. But Christ did not contract original sin, as stated above (Q. 14, A. 3; Q. 15, A. 1). Therefore Christ should not have been circumcised. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Luke 2:21): "After eight days were accomplished, that the child should be circumcised." _I answer that,_ For several reasons Christ ought to have been circumcised. First, in order to prove the reality of His human nature, in contradiction to the Manicheans, who said that He had an imaginary body: and in contradiction to Apollinarius, who said that Christ's body was consubstantial with His Godhead; and in contradiction to Valentine, who said that Christ brought His body from heaven. Secondly, in order to show His approval of circumcision, which God had institu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419  
420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Christ
 

circumcision

 
circumcised
 

Therefore

 

contradiction

 

original

 
Further
 

reality

 
prescribed
 
covenant

written

 

accomplished

 

CHRIST

 

consubstantial

 

Apollinarius

 
wherefore
 

Godhead

 

action

 

ceased

 

fulfilled


institu

 

brought

 
lesson
 

heaven

 
Secondly
 

approval

 
Valentine
 

stated

 

contract

 
answer

contrary
 

reasons

 

Manicheans

 

nature

 

remedy

 

profit

 

imaginary

 

Articles

 

profession

 

debtor


circumcising

 

observing

 

testify

 
refraining
 
mortify
 

gnifies

 

mortification

 

QUESTION

 

ACCOMPLISHED

 
REGARD