FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429  
430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   >>   >|  
t rather than to the observance of the Old Law. Reply Obj. 3: Those baptisms of the Pharisees were vain, being ordered merely unto carnal cleanliness. But the baptism of John was ordered unto spiritual cleanliness, since it led men to do penance, as stated above. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [III, Q. 38, Art. 2] Whether the Baptism of John Was from God? Objection 1: It would seem that the baptism of John was not from God. For nothing sacramental that is from God is named after a mere man: thus the baptism of the New Law is not named after Peter or Paul, but after Christ. But that baptism is named after John, according to Matt. 21:25: "The baptism of John . . . was it from heaven or from men?" Therefore the baptism of John was not from God. Obj. 2: Further, every doctrine that proceeds from God anew is confirmed by some signs: thus the Lord (Ex. 4) gave Moses the power of working signs; and it is written (Heb. 2:3, 4) that our faith "having begun to be declared by the Lord, was confirmed unto us by them that heard Him, God also bearing them witness by signs and wonders." But it is written of John the Baptist (John 10:41) that "John did no sign." Therefore it seems that the baptism wherewith he baptized was not from God. Obj. 3: Further, those sacraments which are instituted by God are contained in certain precepts of Holy Scripture. But there is no precept of Holy Writ commanding the baptism of John. Therefore it seems that it was not from God. _On the contrary,_ It is written (John 1:33): "He who sent me to baptize with water said to me: 'He upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit,'" etc. _I answer that,_ Two things may be considered in the baptism of John--namely, the rite of baptism and the effect of baptism. The rite of baptism was not from men, but from God, who by an interior revelation of the Holy Ghost sent John to baptize. But the effect of that baptism was from man, because it effected nothing that man could not accomplish. Wherefore it was not from God alone, except in as far as God works in man. Reply Obj. 1: By the baptism of the New Law men are baptized inwardly by the Holy Ghost, and this is accomplished by God alone. But by the baptism of John the body alone was cleansed by the water. Wherefore it is written (Matt. 3:11): "I baptize you in water; but . . . He shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost." For this reason the baptism of John was named after him, because it effected noth
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429  
430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

baptism

 

baptize

 

written

 
Therefore
 

baptized

 
confirmed
 

Further

 
cleanliness
 

effected

 
Wherefore

effect

 
ordered
 
contrary
 
Scripture
 

commanding

 
cleansed
 

precept

 

precepts

 

sacraments

 
wherewith

reason

 

contained

 
instituted
 

Spirit

 

interior

 

answer

 

things

 

considered

 

revelation

 

inwardly


accomplish

 

accomplished

 

ARTICLE

 
SECOND
 

stated

 

Whether

 
sacramental
 

Objection

 
Baptism
 

penance


baptisms

 
observance
 

Pharisees

 
spiritual
 

carnal

 

declared

 
Baptist
 

wonders

 

bearing

 

witness