FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442  
443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   >>   >|  
by special dispensation, in accordance with the ruling of Divine wisdom, it has been granted to some, contrary to the common law, to exercise the functions of governing or teaching, such as Solomon, Daniel, and Jeremias. Reply Obj. 4: It was not fitting that Christ should be baptized by John either before or after all others. Because, as Chrysostom says (Hom. iv in Matth. [*From the supposititious Opus Imperfectum]), for this was Christ baptized, "that He might confirm the preaching and the baptism of John, and that John might bear witness to Him." Now, men would not have had faith in John's testimony except after many had been baptized by him. Consequently it was not fitting that John should baptize Him before baptizing anyone else. In like manner, neither was it fitting that he should baptize Him last. For as he (Chrysostom) says in the same passage: "As the light of the sun does not wait for the setting of the morning star, but comes forth while the latter is still above the horizon, and by its brilliance dims its shining: so Christ did not wait till John had run his course, but appeared while he was yet teaching and baptizing." _______________________ FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 39, Art. 4] Whether Christ Should Have Been Baptized in the Jordan? Objection 1: It would seem that Christ should not have been baptized in the Jordan. For the reality should correspond to the figure. But baptism was prefigured in the crossing of the Red Sea, where the Egyptians were drowned, just as our sins are blotted out in baptism. Therefore it seems that Christ should rather have been baptized in the sea than in the river Jordan. Obj. 2: Further, "Jordan" is interpreted a "going down." But by baptism a man goes up rather than down: wherefore it is written (Matt. 3:16) that "Jesus being baptized, forthwith came up [Douay: 'out'] from the water." Therefore it seems unfitting that Christ should be baptized in the Jordan. Obj. 3: Further, while the children of Israel were crossing, the waters of the Jordan "were turned back," as it is related Jos. 4, and as it is written Ps. 113:3, 5. But those who are baptized go forward, not back. Therefore it was not fitting that Christ should be baptized in the Jordan. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Mk. 1:9) that "Jesus was baptized by John in the Jordan." _I answer that,_ It was through the river Jordan that the children of Israel entered into the land of promise. Now, this is the p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442  
443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

baptized

 
Jordan
 
Christ
 

fitting

 

baptism

 

Therefore

 

written

 

Further

 

baptizing

 

crossing


baptize

 
Israel
 

Chrysostom

 
children
 
teaching
 

contrary

 

answer

 

entered

 

Egyptians

 

drowned


figure

 

Baptized

 

Should

 

Whether

 

Objection

 
promise
 

prefigured

 

correspond

 

reality

 
unfitting

waters

 

turned

 

wherefore

 

forthwith

 
forward
 

related

 

interpreted

 
blotted
 

supposititious

 

Because


Imperfectum
 

witness

 

confirm

 

preaching

 

Jeremias

 

Divine

 

wisdom

 

ruling

 

special

 
dispensation