FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263  
264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   >>   >|  
ures of the subsequent seventeen years, and these figures, which I shall presently add, do not affect the conflict of principles, though they throw into more vivid relief than ever the outcome of conflicting principles. In composition it was a very strong Commission; it consulted the highest financial authorities in the Kingdom; it made for two years an exhaustive examination, historical and practical, of the questions submitted to it, and although the members disagreed on some important points, the conclusions upon which they were unanimous cannot be impugned. The terms of reference were: "1. Upon what principles of comparison, and by the application of what specific standards, the relative capacity of Great Britain and Ireland to bear taxation may be most equitably determined. "2. What, so far as can be ascertained, is the true proportion, under the principles and specific standards so determined, between the taxable capacity of Great Britain and Ireland. "3. The history of the financial relations between Great Britain and Ireland at and after the Legislative Union, the charge for Irish purposes on the Imperial Exchequer during that period, and the amount of Irish taxation remaining available for contribution to Imperial expenditure; also the Imperial expenditure to which it is considered equitable that Ireland should contribute." It will be observed that Questions 1 and 2 deal with abstract points, No. 3 (except the last clause) with concrete facts.[103] In their short unanimous Report the Commissioners began by stating that "Great Britain and Ireland must, for the purposes of this inquiry, be considered as separate entities." To Question 1 they made no unanimous answer. This was immaterial, because, as a result of numerous tests (assessment to estate duties and income-tax, consumption of commodities, population, etc.) all arrived unanimously at an answer to the next question. Answer to Question 2 (and incidentally, as will be seen, to part of Question 3): "That whilst the tax revenue of Ireland is about _one-eleventh_ of that of Great Britain, the relative taxable capacity of Ireland is very much smaller, _and is not estimated by any of us as exceeding one-twentieth_." The wording of the answer needs to be explained by reference to the text of the Report. (_a_) In saying "tax revenue" the Commissioners meant to exclude non-tax revenue--_e.g._, Post Office receipts, etc.--but the Commissioners i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263  
264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Ireland
 
Britain
 
principles
 

capacity

 
Imperial
 

answer

 

Commissioners

 

Question

 
unanimous
 

revenue


points

 
specific
 

reference

 

relative

 

standards

 

Report

 

considered

 

expenditure

 
determined
 

purposes


taxation

 

taxable

 

financial

 

commodities

 
immaterial
 

population

 
consumption
 

duties

 

assessment

 

numerous


figures

 

income

 
result
 

estate

 

entities

 

concrete

 

clause

 

inquiry

 

separate

 

seventeen


stating

 

unanimously

 

explained

 

exceeding

 

twentieth

 

wording

 

exclude

 

receipts

 

Office

 

incidentally