FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  
4,054,549 3,226,307 32,263,070 1889-90 7,734,678 5,057,708 2,676,970 26,769,700 1899-1900 8,664,500 6,980,000 1,684,500 16,845,000 Averaged Balances for 90 years 315,603,470 Add, Actual Balances, 1900-09 16,214,000 Net Payments, in 99 years 331,817,470 Deduct Drawings, deficit of 1909-10 2,357,500 Net Payments, in 100 years 329,459,970 Add, Actual Balance, 1910-11 321,000 Net Balances paid by Ireland to Great Britain, 1809-1911 329,780,970 What has become of Sir David Barbour's argument in favour of the existing fiscal system? He admitted that Ireland was overtaxed by two millions and three-quarters. But he showed, it will be remembered, that if not only the revenue, but the expenditure and contribution to Imperial services had all been in proportion to Ireland's real taxable capacity of one-twentieth, she would have been a loser by a million.[117] Ireland, therefore, he argued, had certainly no grievance, while Great Britain received the substantial, though not strictly sufficient, sum of two millions as Ireland's contribution to Imperial expenses. Let us apply the same reasoning to the present situation. Ireland, by hypothesis, is "overtaxed" by three millions,[118] but if not only the revenue, but the expenditure and contribution to Imperial services of Ireland were all in proportion to her real taxable capacity, which we may estimate now at one-twenty-fifth, we find that she would be a loser by five millions. Her "true" revenue from all sources _ought_ on this supposition to be L6,605,900; it _is_ L10,032,000. Her local expenditure _ought_ to be L2,875,540; it _is_ L11,344,500. Her contribution to Imperial services _ought_ to be L3,730,360; it _is_ a minus quantity of L1,312,500. Sir David Barbour's reasoning, then, leads us to this astounding paradox, that Ireland, while overtaxed by three millions, gains five millions by the arrangement. Moreover, whether we accept Sir David Barbour's reasoning or not, it is a fact that to-day Ireland, which contributed to Imperial services five and a half millions in 1860, and two millions in 1894, now, so far from contributing anything, costs a million and a quarter more than she brings in. This, certainly, was not a result he either anticipate
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ireland

 

millions

 

Imperial

 
services
 
contribution
 

Barbour

 
reasoning
 

revenue

 

expenditure

 

overtaxed


Balances
 

Britain

 

proportion

 

capacity

 

taxable

 
Actual
 

Payments

 

million

 

sources

 
supposition

present

 
estimate
 

hypothesis

 

twenty

 

situation

 

contributed

 

accept

 
contributing
 

result

 

anticipate


brings

 

quarter

 

Moreover

 

arrangement

 

astounding

 

paradox

 

quantity

 

argument

 

favour

 

existing


Balance

 

Averaged

 

Deduct

 

Drawings

 

deficit

 

fiscal

 
system
 

twentieth

 

argued

 

sufficient