FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573  
574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   >>   >|  
passed at other localities. Is that true? He said I had a hand in passing them, in his opening speech, that I was in the convention and helped to pass them. Do the resolutions touch me at all? It strikes me there is some difference between holding a man responsible for an act which he has not done and holding him responsible for an act that he has done. You will judge whether there is any difference in the "spots." And he has taken credit for great magnanimity in coming forward and acknowledging what is proved on him beyond even the capacity of Judge Douglas to deny; and he has more capacity in that way than any other living man. Then he wants to know why I won't withdraw the charge in regard to a conspiracy to make slavery national, as he has withdrawn the one he made. May it please his worship, I will withdraw it when it is proven false on me as that was proven false on him. I will add a little more than that, I will withdraw it whenever a reasonable man shall be brought to believe that the charge is not true. I have asked Judge Douglas's attention to certain matters of fact tending to prove the charge of a conspiracy to nationalize slavery, and he says he convinces me that this is all untrue because Buchanan was not in the country at that time, and because the Dred Scott case had not then got into the Supreme Court; and he says that I say the Democratic owners of Dred Scott got up the case. I never did say that I defy Judge Douglas to show that I ever said so, for I never uttered it. [One of Mr. Douglas's reporters gesticulated affirmatively at Mr. Lincoln.] I don't care if your hireling does say I did, I tell you myself that I never said the "Democratic" owners of Dred Scott got up the case. I have never pretended to know whether Dred Scott's owners were Democrats, or Abolitionists, or Freesoilers or Border Ruffians. I have said that there is evidence about the case tending to show that it was a made-up case, for the purpose of getting that decision. I have said that that evidence was very strong in the fact that when Dred Scott was declared to be a slave, the owner of him made him free, showing that he had had the case tried and the question settled for such use as could be made of that decision; he cared nothing about the property thus declared to be his by that decision. But my time is out, and I can say no more. LAST DEBATE, AT ALTON, OCTOBER 15, 1858 Mr. LINCOLN'S REPLY LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:-
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573  
574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Douglas
 

withdraw

 

charge

 

decision

 

owners

 

capacity

 
evidence
 

conspiracy

 

tending

 

proven


slavery

 

Democratic

 

declared

 

responsible

 

difference

 

holding

 

affirmatively

 

LADIES

 

DEBATE

 
Lincoln

GENTLEMEN
 
gesticulated
 
OCTOBER
 

uttered

 

reporters

 
hireling
 

LINCOLN

 
purpose
 

strong

 
showing

settled

 
question
 
property
 

pretended

 
Ruffians
 
Border
 

Freesoilers

 
Democrats
 

Abolitionists

 

credit


magnanimity

 
proved
 

acknowledging

 

coming

 

forward

 

passing

 
opening
 
passed
 

localities

 
speech