FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473  
474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   >>   >|  
ove Paris,[1765] which looks as if they intended to attack the old fortification and get into the city from the University side. Did they mean to carry out the two attacks simultaneously? It is probable. Did they renounce the project of their own accord or against their will? We cannot tell. [Footnote 1765: Perceval de Cagny, p. 161. Vallet de Viriville, _Histoire de Charles VII_, vol. ii, p. 120, note 1. G. Lefevre-Pontalis, _Un detail du siege de Paris, par Jeanne d'Arc_, in _Bibliotheque de l'Ecole des Chartes_, vol. xlvi, 1885, pp. 5 _et seq._] Beneath the walls of Charles V they assembled a quantity of artillery, cannons, culverins, mortars; and in hand-carts they brought fagots to fill up the trenches, hurdles to bridge them over and seven hundred ladders: very elaborate material for the siege, despite their having, as we shall see, forgotten what was most necessary.[1766] They came not therefore to skirmish nor to do great feats of arms. They came to attempt in broad daylight the escalading and the storming of the greatest, the most illustrious, and the most populous town of the realm; an undertaking of vast importance, proposed doubtless and decided in the royal council and with the knowledge of the King, who can have been neither indifferent nor hostile to it.[1767] Charles of Valois wanted to retake Paris. It remains to be seen whether for the accomplishment of his desire he depended merely on men-at-arms and ladders. [Footnote 1766: Deliberation of the Chapter of Notre Dame, _loc. cit._ _Journal d'un bourgeois de Paris_, p. 245. Falconbridge, in _Trial_, vol. iv, p. 457.] [Footnote 1767: _Trial_, vol. i, pp. 240, 246, 298; vol. iii, pp. 425, 427; vol. v, pp. 97, 107, 130, 140.] It would seem that the Maid had not been told of the resolutions taken.[1768] She was never consulted and was seldom informed of what had been decided. But she was as sure of entering the town that day as of going to Paradise when she died. For more than three years her Voices had been drumming the attack on Paris in her ears.[1769] But the astonishing point is that, saint as she was, she should have consented to arm and fight on the day of the Nativity. It was contrary to her action on the 5th of May, Ascension Day, and inconsistent with what she had said on the 8th of the same month: "As ye love and honour the Sacred Sabbath do not begin the battle."[1770] [Footnote 1768: _Ibid._, pp. 57, 146, 168, 250.] [Footnote 176
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473  
474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Charles

 

attack

 
ladders
 

decided

 
Falconbridge
 

indifferent

 
hostile
 

bourgeois

 
depended

accomplishment

 
desire
 
remains
 
Journal
 

Chapter

 
retake
 

Deliberation

 

wanted

 

Valois

 
seldom

Ascension

 

inconsistent

 
consented
 

Nativity

 

action

 

contrary

 

battle

 

honour

 

Sacred

 

Sabbath


consulted

 

informed

 

entering

 
resolutions
 

Paradise

 

drumming

 
Voices
 

astonishing

 
escalading
 

Histoire


Viriville

 
Perceval
 

Vallet

 
Lefevre
 

Pontalis

 

Chartes

 
Bibliotheque
 

detail

 

Jeanne

 

University