FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307  
308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>   >|  
\ SENSIBLE || INSENSIBLE || ANIMAL / \ RATIONAL || IRRATIONAL || MAN //||\\ // || \\ // || \\ // || \\ // || \\ // || \\ // || \\ _Socrates_ _Plato_ _Aristotle_ Beginning with 'Substance,' as _summum genus_, and adding the difference 'Corporeal,' we frame the species 'Body.' Taking 'Body' as the genus and adding the difference 'Animate,' we frame the species 'Living Body;' and so on till 'Man' is reached; which, being _infima species_, is only subdivisible into individuals. But the division of Man into individuals involves a change of principle; it is a division of the denotation, not an increase of the connotation as in the earlier steps. Only one side of each dichotomy is followed out in the 'tree': if the other side had been taken, Incorporeal Substance would be 'Spirit'; which might be similarly subdivided. Genus and species, then, have a double relation. In denotation the genus includes the species; in connotation the species includes the genus. Hence the doctrine that by increasing the connotation of a name we decrease its denotation: if, for example, to the definition of 'lion' we add 'inhabiting Africa,' Asiatic lions are no longer denoted by it. On the other hand, if we use a name to denote objects that it did not formerly apply to, some of the connotation must be dropped: if, for example, the name 'lion' be used to include 'pumas,' the tufted tail and mane can no longer be part of the meaning of the word; since pumas have not these properties. This doctrine is logically or formally true, but it may not always be true in fact. It is logically true; because wherever we add to the connotation of a name, it is possible that some things to which it formerly applied are now excluded from its denotation, though we may not know of any such things. Still, as a matter of fact, an object may be discovered to have a property previously unknown, and this property may be fundamental and co-extensive with the denotation of its name, or even more widely prevalent. The discovery that the whale is a mammal did not limit the class 'whale'; nor did the discovery that lions, dogs, wo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307  
308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

species

 

connotation

 

denotation

 

discovery

 

property

 

includes

 
things
 

logically

 
longer
 

doctrine


difference

 
adding
 
individuals
 
Substance
 

division

 
IRRATIONAL
 

Socrates

 
applied
 

RATIONAL

 

formally


Beginning
 

tufted

 

meaning

 

Aristotle

 

properties

 

excluded

 

INSENSIBLE

 

prevalent

 
widely
 

SENSIBLE


mammal

 

extensive

 

matter

 

object

 

discovered

 

fundamental

 

unknown

 

previously

 
ANIMAL
 
include

dropped
 

subdivided

 
similarly
 
double
 

relation

 
reached
 

infima

 

Spirit

 

subdivisible

 
dichotomy