FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>  
it asketh a strong wit and a strong heart to know when to tell the truth, and to do it; therefore it is the weaker sort of politicians that are the greatest dissemblers." (Bacon.) (g) Money being a barren product, it is contrary to nature to make it reproduce itself. Usury, therefore, is unnatural, and, being unnatural, is unjustifiable. (h) The study of mathematics is essential to a complete course of education, because it induces a habit of close and regular reasoning. [S] 101. Explain and illustrate the following terms:--Subalternans, _Vera Causa_, Plurality of Causes, Law of Nature, Empirical Law, _Summum Genus_, Predicament, _Arbor Porphyriana_, Axiom, Universe of discourse (_suppositio_), Antinomy, Dilemma, Realism, Dichotomy, etc. 102. Is there any distinction and, if so, what, between a complete Description and an Explanation? [C] 103. On what principles have fallacies been classified? To what extent do you think a satisfactory classification of Fallacies possible? [C] 104. Examine how far conceptions of Persistence and of Invariable Concomitance of Properties are involved in the methodological application of the conception of Cause. 104A. Inquire whether the two following propositions can be reconciled with one another: (a) The same conjunction of antecedents is invariably followed by the same consequent; (b) We never find the same concurrence of phenomena a second time. [C] 105. Using the term Logic in a wide sense, so as to include Methodology, inquire how far a Logic of Observation is possible, and show in what it will consist. [C] 106. What is Proof? Explain and discuss the following dicta:--(a) _Qui nimium probat, nihil probat_: (b) A bad proof is worse than no proof; (c) The exception proves the rule; (d) Negatives cannot be proved. [C] 107. Examine how far the rules of immediate and syllogistic inference are modified by differences of interpretation of the categorical proposition in respect of the existence of the subject. [S] 108. "An effect is but the sum of all the partial causes, the concurrence of which constitutes its existence." "The cause of an event is its invariable and unconditional antecedent." Explain and compare these two theories of causation. Does either alone exhaust the scientific conception of cause? [S] 109. Under what logical conditions are statistical inferences authorised, and what is the nature of their conclusions? [S]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>  



Top keywords:

Explain

 

Examine

 

unnatural

 

probat

 

existence

 

nature

 
complete
 

strong

 
conception
 

concurrence


invariably

 
consist
 
antecedents
 
discuss
 

conjunction

 
nimium
 

inquire

 
phenomena
 

consequent

 

Observation


Methodology
 

include

 

compare

 

antecedent

 

theories

 

causation

 

unconditional

 

invariable

 
partial
 

constitutes


inferences

 

statistical

 

authorised

 

conclusions

 

conditions

 

logical

 

exhaust

 

scientific

 
proved
 
Negatives

exception
 

proves

 
syllogistic
 
inference
 

subject

 
effect
 

respect

 

proposition

 

modified

 
differences