FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
Eusebian," making him the turning-point of the controversy. Indeed, further on, Dr. Lightfoot himself admits: "The testimony of Eusebius first differentiates them." [82:1] The argument (2 and 3) that the eight rejected Epistles betray anachronisms and interpolations, is no refutation of my statement, for the same accusation is brought by the majority of critics against the Vossian Epistles. The fourth and last argument seems more directly addressed to a second paragraph quoted by Dr. Lightfoot, to which I refer above, and which I have reserved till now, as it requires more detailed notice. It is this:-- "It is a total mistake to suppose that the seven Epistles mentioned by Eusebius have been transmitted to us in any special way. These Epistles are mixed up in the Medicean and corresponding ancient Latin MSS. with the other eight Epistles, universally pronounced to be spurious, without distinction of any kind, and all have equal honour." [82:2] I will at once give Dr. Lightfoot's comment on this, in contrast with the statement of a writer equally distinguished for learning and orthodoxy--Dr. Tregelles:-- DR. LIGHTFOOT. | DR. TREGELLES. | (4) "It is not strictly true that | "It is a mistake to think of _seven_ the seven Epistles are mixed up | Ignatian Epistles in Greek having with the confessedly spurious | been _transmitted_ to us, for no Epistles. In the Greek and Latin | such seven exist, except through MSS., as also in the Armenian | their having been selected by version, the spurious Epistles | _editors_ from the Medicean MS. come after the others; and the | which contains so much that circumstance, combined with the | is confessedly spurious;--a fact facts already mentioned, plainly | which some who imagine a shows that they were a later | diplomatic transmission of addition, borrowed from the Long | _seven_ have overlooked." [83:2] Recension to complete the body | of Ignatian letters." [83:1] | I will further quote the words of Cureton, for, as Dr. Lightfoot advances nothing but assertions, it is well to meet him with the testimony of others rather than the mere reiteration of my own statement. Cureton says: "Again, there is another circumstance which will naturally lead us to look with some suspicion upon the recension of the Epistles of St. Ignatius, as exhibited in t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Epistles

 
spurious
 

Lightfoot

 

statement

 

Medicean

 

mistake

 
Cureton
 
circumstance
 

mentioned

 
transmitted

Eusebius

 

argument

 

Ignatian

 

confessedly

 

testimony

 

plainly

 

imagine

 

Armenian

 
selected
 

version


editors

 

combined

 

addition

 

reiteration

 
naturally
 

Ignatius

 
exhibited
 

recension

 

suspicion

 
borrowed

overlooked

 

transmission

 

diplomatic

 

Recension

 

complete

 

assertions

 
advances
 

letters

 

quoted

 

Indeed


paragraph

 

directly

 

addressed

 

controversy

 
requires
 
detailed
 

notice

 

reserved

 
fourth
 

anachronisms