amusing, and even instructive, dissertation. Thus, by way
of specimen, take the following:
God is extended; but, nevertheless, incorporeal.
God thinks; but, nevertheless, has no intelligence.
God is active; but, nevertheless, has no will.
The soul is a "mode" of the Divine thought; but, nevertheless, there is
no analogy between God's thought and man's thought.
The love of God is the supreme law of man; but, nevertheless, it is
equally lawful for man to live according to appetite or to reason.
The will of man, is, in no sense, free; but, nevertheless, there is a
science of human ethics.
Man is under no natural obligation to obey God; but, nevertheless, God
is his highest good.
God is neither a Lawgiver nor a Governor; but, nevertheless, a future
state is necessary, that every man may have his due.
Might is Right, and Government has power to restrain "the liberty of
Prophesying;" but, nevertheless, has no power to restrain "the liberty
of Philosophizing."
These are only a few specimens of the gratuitous assumptions and
flagrant contradictions with which his writings abound; but they afford
a sufficient proof of the reckless character of his genius, and of the
utter fallacy of the system which he promulgated as a rival, or as a
substitute, for Natural and Revealed Religion.
On a review of what has been advanced, it must be manifest that the
Pantheistic system of Spinoza is founded on principles assumed without
proof, and embodied in his "definitions;" that it is constructed
according to a philosophical method which is radically vicious; that it
abounds in self-contradictory statements; and that it is opposed, at
many points, to some of the clearest lessons of experience, and to some
of the surest convictions of reason. It is a system which is not
demonstrated, but merely developed. The germ of it exists in the
"definitions;" deny these, and you destroy his whole philosophy. It
cannot, therefore, be held sufficient to foreclose the question
respecting the existence of a living, personal God, distinct from Nature
and independent of it; nor can Pantheism, in this form, become the
successful rival of Christian Theism, until the human mind has lost the
power of discriminating between the different kinds of evidence to which
they respectively appeal.
SECTION II.
MATERIAL OR HYLOZOIC PANTHEISM.
In the system of Spinoza, the two "attributes of _extension_ and
_thought_" and the corresponding "mode
|