FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
his so-called "Alexandrine Recension." But then, on the Critic's own hypothesis, (as we have seen already,) Codex B. ought, on the contrary, to have _contained_ it. How was that inconvenient fact to be got over? Griesbach quietly remarks in a foot-note that Codex B. "_has affinity_ with the Eastern family of MSS."--The misfortune of being saddled with a worthless theory was surely never more apparent. By the time we have reached this point in the investigation, we are reminded of nothing so much as of the weary traveller who, having patiently pursued an _ignis fatuus_ through half the night, beholds it at last vanish; but not until it has conducted him up to his chin in the mire. Neither Hug, nor Scholz his pupil,--who in 1808 and 1830 respectively followed Griesbach with modifications of his recension-theory,--concurred in the unfavourable sentence which their illustrious predecessor had passed on the concluding portion of S. Mark's Gospel. The latter even eagerly vindicated its genuineness.(10) But with Lachmann,--whose unsatisfactory text of the Gospels appeared in 1842,--originated a new principle of Textual Revision; the principle, namely, of paying exclusive and absolute deference to the testimony of a few arbitrarily selected ancient documents; no regard being paid to others of the same or of yet higher antiquity. This is not the right place for discussing this plausible and certainly most convenient scheme of textual revision. That it leads to conclusions little short of irrational, is certain. I notice it only because it supplies the clue to the result which, as far as S. Mark xvi. 9-20 is concerned, has been since arrived at by Dr. Tischendorf, Dr. Tregelles, and Dean Alford,(11)--the three latest critics who have formally undertaken to reconstruct the sacred Text. They agree in assuring their readers that the genuine Gospel of S. Mark extends no further than ch. xvi. ver. 8: in other words, that all that follows the words {~GREEK SMALL LETTER EPSILON WITH PSILI~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER PHI~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER OMICRON~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER BETA~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER OMICRON~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER UPSILON WITH PERISPOMENI~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER NU~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER TAU~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER OMICRON~} {~GREEK SMALL LETTER GAMMA~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER ALPHA WITH OXIA~}{~GREEK SMALL LETTER RHO~} is an unauthorized addition by some later hand; "a fragment,"--distinguishable from the rest of the Gospel not less by in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

LETTER

 

OMICRON

 

Gospel

 

theory

 

Griesbach

 
principle
 

revision

 

conclusions

 

result

 

supplies


notice
 

textual

 

irrational

 

higher

 

regard

 

arbitrarily

 

selected

 
ancient
 

documents

 

antiquity


convenient

 

plausible

 

discussing

 

scheme

 

Tischendorf

 

fragment

 
EPSILON
 
addition
 

PERISPOMENI

 
UPSILON

unauthorized

 

extends

 

Alford

 
latest
 

Tregelles

 

arrived

 

distinguishable

 

critics

 
formally
 

assuring


readers

 

genuine

 

undertaken

 

reconstruct

 

sacred

 

concerned

 
genuineness
 
reached
 

investigation

 

apparent