FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961  
962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   >>   >|  
ette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943). On the same day the Court held that a State may not forbid the distribution of literature urging and advising, on religious grounds, that citizens refrain from saluting the flag. Taylor _v._ Mississippi, 319 U.S. 583 (1943). [54] Martin _v._ Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 (1943). [55] Prince _v._ Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944). [56] 334 U.S. 558 (1948). [57] Kovacs _v._ Cooper, 336 U.S. 77 (1949). [58] Kunz _v._ New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951). [59] Ibid. 314. [60] Niemotko _v._ Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951). [61] Feiner _v._ New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951). [62] _See_ p. 1285. [Transcriber's Note: There is no mention of the Feiner case on p. 1285.] [63] Arver _v._ United States, 245 U.S. 366 (1918). [64] 293 U.S. 245 (1934). [65] 325 U.S. 561 (1945). _cf._ Girouard _v._ United States, 328 U.S. 61 (1946) holding "an alien who is willing to take the oath of allegiance and to serve in the army as a non-combatant but who, because of religious scruples, is unwilling to bear arms in defense of this country may be admitted to citizenship * * *", overruling United States _v._ Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929) and United States _v._ Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605 (1931). [66] 325 U.S. 561, 578 (1945). [67] Commentaries, Vol. IV, 151-152. [68] Justice Frankfurter in Dennis _v._ United States, 341 U.S. 494, 521-522 (1951). [69] Ibid. 524; citing Robertson _v._ Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275, 281 (1897). [70] Ibid. 524; citing Gompers _v._ United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). "While the courts have from an early date taken a hand in crystallizing American conceptions of freedom of speech and press into law, it is scarcely in the manner or to the extent which they are frequently assumed to have done. The great initial problem in this realm of constitutional liberty was to get rid of the common law of 'seditious libel' which operated to put persons in authority beyond the reach of public criticism. The first step in this direction was taken in the famous, or infamous, Sedition Act of 1798, which admitted the defense of truth in prosecution brought under it, and submitted the general issue of defendant's guilt to the jury. But the substantive doctrine of 'seditious libel' the Act of 1798 still retained, a circumstance which put several critics of President Adams in jail, and thereby considerably aided Jefferson's election as President in 1800. Once in office, nevertheless, Jefferson him
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961  
962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 

States

 
Feiner
 

seditious

 

defense

 

religious

 

President

 
Jefferson
 

admitted

 

citing


manner

 

scarcely

 

extent

 

Baldwin

 
Robertson
 

Frankfurter

 

Justice

 

Dennis

 

Gompers

 

crystallizing


American

 

freedom

 
conceptions
 
courts
 
speech
 

substantive

 
doctrine
 

retained

 
submitted
 
general

defendant
 

circumstance

 
office
 
election
 

critics

 

considerably

 
brought
 
prosecution
 

liberty

 
constitutional

common

 

problem

 

assumed

 

frequently

 

initial

 

operated

 
persons
 

famous

 
direction
 

infamous