FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
wo orders are exactly opposite in spirit, principle, purpose, and method. All that they have in common is that they are both _secret_ societies, which makes it plain that the opposition of the Latin church to Masonry is not on the ground of its being a secret order, else why sanction the Jesuits, to name no other? The difference has been stated in this way: "Opposite poles these two societies are, for each possesses precisely those qualities which the other lacks. The Jesuits are strongly centralized, the Freemasons only confederated. Jesuits are controlled by one man's will, Freemasons are under majority rule. Jesuits bottom morality in expediency, Freemasons in regard for the well-being of mankind. Jesuits recognize only one creed, Freemasons hold in respect all honest convictions. Jesuits seek to break down individual independence, Freemasons to build it up" (_Mysteria_, by Otto Henne Am Rhyn). [141] For a detailed account of the Duke of Wharton and the true history of the Gormogons, see an essay by R.F. Gould, in his "Masonic Celebrities" series (_A. Q. C._, viii, 144), and more recently, _The Life and Writings of Philip, Duke of Wharton_, by Lewis Melville. [142] Findel has a nobly eloquent passage on this point, and it tells the everlasting truth (_History of Masonry_, p. 378). His whole history, indeed, is exceedingly worth reading, the more so because it was one of the first books of the right kind, and it stimulated research. [143] A paper entitled "An Unrecorded Grand Lodge," by Sadler (_A. Q. C._, vol. xviii, 69-90), tells practically all that is known of this movement, which merged with the Grand Lodge of London in 1776. [144] Nor was that all. In 1735 it was resolved in the Grand Lodge "that in the future all Grand Officers (except Grand Master) shall be selected out of that body"--meaning the past Grand Stewards. This act was amazing. Already the Craft had let go its power to elect the Wardens, and now the choice of the Grand Master was narrowed to the ranks of an oligarchy in its worst form--a queer outcome of Masonic equality. Three months later the Grand Stewards presented a memorial asking that they "might form themselves into a special lodge," with special jewels, etc. Naturally this bred discontent and apprehension, and justly so. [145] Often we speak of "the York Rite," as though it were the oldest and truest form of Masonry, but, while it serves to distinguish one branch of Masonry from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Jesuits
 

Freemasons

 

Masonry

 
Masonic
 

special

 

Wharton

 

history

 

secret

 

Master

 

societies


Stewards

 
selected
 

merged

 
movement
 
exceedingly
 

resolved

 

future

 

Officers

 

London

 

entitled


research

 

Unrecorded

 

practically

 

reading

 

stimulated

 
Sadler
 

choice

 

apprehension

 

discontent

 

justly


Naturally

 

jewels

 
serves
 

distinguish

 

branch

 

truest

 

oldest

 

Wardens

 

amazing

 

Already


months
 
presented
 

memorial

 

equality

 

outcome

 
narrowed
 

oligarchy

 
meaning
 
possesses
 

precisely