FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  
facts, in explaining their origin and unfolding their effects, his guidance is least valuable. We may more safely ask him _what_ than _why_. His influence on English art has been great at the instant: whether it will be permanent is doubtful. At one time it was said that without having read his books one could tell by an inspection of the Royal Academy walls what Mr. Ruskin had written in the past year. Now, the most notable exponents of his teaching, whether consciously so or not, are on the one hand the shining lights of the Grosvenor Gallery--hierophants of mysticism and allegory and symbolism and painted souls and moral beauty expressed in the flesh, copying Ruskin's _Botticelli_ line for line, forgetting that what was naivete in him, and in him admirable, because all before him had done so much less well, becomes to-day in them the direst affectation, is reprehensible in them because many before them have done so much better. On the other hand, we have a naturalistic throng which follows Mr. Ruskin's precepts when he overweights the other side of the scale and says that art should "never exist alone, never for itself," never except as "representing a true"--defined as actually-existing--"thing or decorating a useful thing;" when he declares that every attempt by the imagination to "exalt or refine healthy humanity has weakened or caricatured it." Mr. Ruskin bade men "go to Nature in all singleness of heart, and walk with her laboriously and trustingly, having no other thought but how best to penetrate her meaning, _rejecting nothing, selecting nothing and scorning nothing_;" and Mr. Hamerton was literally obeying him when he exiled himself for five years in a hut on an island in a bleak Scotch lake to learn faithfully to portray the shores of that single lake. Was it thus that Titian studied in his youth, and learned how, years after in Venice, to paint the chestnuts and the hills of Cadore a thousand-fold more artistically and more truly, because more abstractly and more ideally, than could all the "pre-Raphaelite" copyists of to-day? Thus we see the two extremes of Mr. Ruskin's teaching--see him at one time exalting imagination and feeling over the pictorial part of art, at another degrading art into the servilest copying. Observers may disagree as to whether these cognate things--self-consciousness in the artist, aesthetic philosophizing in the critic, and the taste for a literary rather than a pictorial value
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ruskin

 

imagination

 

copying

 

teaching

 

pictorial

 
thought
 

exiled

 

healthy

 

island

 
laboriously

refine

 
trustingly
 

literally

 

Nature

 

rejecting

 

meaning

 

penetrate

 

selecting

 

scorning

 

obeying


singleness

 

weakened

 

caricatured

 

Hamerton

 

humanity

 

degrading

 

servilest

 

Observers

 

extremes

 

exalting


feeling

 
disagree
 

critic

 

literary

 

philosophizing

 
aesthetic
 

things

 

cognate

 

consciousness

 

artist


copyists

 

Raphaelite

 

Titian

 

studied

 

learned

 

single

 
Scotch
 

faithfully

 

portray

 

shores