FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657  
658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   >>   >|  
e Navy!(4) It expended scarcely three millions to aid in building up its mercantile marine, and expended much of that unwisely. [(1) The Louisiana Commission was composed as follows: General Joseph R. Hawley of Connecticut, Judge Charles B. Lawrence of Ohio, General John M. Harlan of Kentucky, Ex-Governor John C. Brown of Tennessee, Hon. Wayne McVeagh of Pennsylvania.] [(2) The International Monetary Conference for which provision was made in the bill was held at Paris in the autumn of 1878. The American Commissioners were Reuben K. Fenton, William S. Groesbeck, and Francis A. Walker, with S. Dana Horton as Secretary. The principal European Nations were present with the exception of Germany. The Commissioners receive the impression that decided progress had been made towards the remonetization of silver in Europe, but subsequent event have not vindicated their judgment. Mr. Goschen, who was the head of the British delegation, declared that "it would be a misfortune for the world if a movement for a sole gold standard should succeed;" but he indicated no purpose on the part of his own government to change from the gold standard. The Conference came to no practical conclusion, simply agreeing that "it is necessary to maintain in the world the monetary functions of silver as well as those of gold;" but that "the selection for use of one or the other of the two metals, or both simultaneously, should be governed by the special position of each State or group of States." The proposition of the United States "that the delegations recommend to their respective governments the adjustment of a fixed relation between the two metals and the use of both in that relation as unlimited legal-tender money," was rejected. The supporters of a bi-metallic standard, though disappointed in the immediate result of the Conference, received encouragement from the advance in International opinion in the years that had elapsed since the previous Conference (1867). At that time the Nations declared almost unanimously in favor of a single standard of gold. Many of them had found in the interval great difficulty in maintaining it and were withheld from declaring for the double standard simply by the influence and example of England.] [(3) The following tables have been prepared with care by Hon. A. Loudon Snowden, the able superintendent for several years of the United States Mint at Philadelphia. ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF GOLD AND SIL
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657  
658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

standard

 

Conference

 

States

 

Nations

 

International

 

Commissioners

 
silver
 

metals

 
United
 

relation


simply

 
declared
 
General
 
expended
 

governments

 
adjustment
 

respective

 
proposition
 

delegations

 

recommend


unlimited
 

metallic

 

disappointed

 

supporters

 

tender

 

rejected

 

selection

 

building

 
functions
 

maintain


monetary

 

special

 

position

 

result

 

governed

 

simultaneously

 

millions

 

scarcely

 
received
 
tables

prepared
 

Loudon

 
double
 
influence
 

England

 
Snowden
 

PRODUCTION

 

ANNUAL

 

superintendent

 
Philadelphia