FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661  
662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   >>   >|  
ould be demanded only in exchange for some equivalent; and the equivalent to be asked, as was well known, would be the concession to Great Britain of the free navigation of the Mississippi River. The position thus taken by the British Government was plainly untenable. The treaty of 1782 was only the formal declaration of certain facts consequent upon the termination of the Revolutionary war. That treaty recognized three conditions as fully established: I. The independence of the thirteen Colonies. II. The territorial limits of the United States. III. The rights and methods of the common fisheries in Colonial waters which the citizens of the United States had exercised as British subjects.--The history of the negotiation and the explicit language of the treaty prove that the clause touching the fisheries was the recognition of an _existing_ right and not the grant of a _new_ right. The British Government, in 1814, might with equal force and justice have claimed that under this theory of the abrogation of the treaty of 1782 by war, the recognition of our independence and the establishment of our boundaries had also become void. It is a rather curious fact, apparently unknown or unnoticed by the negotiators of 1814, that as late as 1768 the law officers of the Crown under the last Ministry of Lord Chatham (to whom was referred the treaty of 1686 with France, containing certain stipulations in reference to the Newfoundland fisheries) gave as their opinion that such clauses were permanent in their character, and that so far the treaty was valid, notwithstanding subsequent war. The American negotiators of course refused to admit the principle (that the war of 1812 had put an end to any provision of the treaty of 1782) or its application; and the result was that the Treaty of Ghent was signed and ratified, without any provisions either as to the Fisheries or the navigation of the Mississippi River,--a position which left the United States in the full exercise of its rights under the treaty of 1782, from which it could be excluded only by the exercise of force on the part of the British Government. There was no danger of force being applied. The war of 1812 had satisfied Great Britain that she could gain nothing by going to war with the United States. Within four years of this time a treaty was negotiated and ratified, which is altogether the most inexplicable in our diplomatic history. The war just concluded with
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661  
662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

treaty

 

United

 

States

 

British

 

Government

 

fisheries

 
recognition
 

equivalent

 
ratified
 

exercise


rights

 
negotiators
 
independence
 
history
 

Mississippi

 
navigation
 

position

 
Britain
 

principle

 

notwithstanding


character
 

subsequent

 

inexplicable

 

refused

 

permanent

 

American

 

diplomatic

 

clauses

 
France
 

referred


Ministry

 

Chatham

 

concluded

 

stipulations

 

opinion

 

Newfoundland

 

reference

 

excluded

 
Within
 
applied

satisfied
 

danger

 
application
 
result
 

Treaty

 
provision
 

negotiated

 

altogether

 

provisions

 
Fisheries