FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670  
671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   >>   >|  
g to devices for delay. Circumstances all pointed in that direction. The Government of the United States had submitted the names of six Ministers, representing countries of which at least four held more intimate relations with Great Britain than with the United States. Specific reasons had been given for not mentioning others. After a totally unreasonable delay (from July 11 to August 19) the English Government responded, _proposing the very name that had originally been objected to by the United States--proposing it with the urgency of a personal request from Lord Granville_. When it was found that our Government would not accept Mr. Delfosse, the intelligence came within a week that the Canadian Government objected to any foreign Minister, who had been residing in Washington, as third Commissioner. Of course this objection excluded Mr. Delfosse with all the others, for Mr. Delfosse had resided in Washington several years longer than the majority of those who had been proposed by the United States. Mr. Fish very justly and sharply rebuked this interposition of the Government of Canada. On September 6 he wrote to Sir Edward that "the reference to the people of the Dominion of Canada seems to imply a practical transfer to that Province of the right of nomination which the treaty gives to her Majesty." He informed Sir Edward that "in the opinion of the President, a refusal on his part to make a nomination, or to concur in the conjoint nomination contemplated by the treaty, on the ground that some local interest (that for instance of the fishermen of Gloucester) objected to the primary mode of filling the commission intended by the treaty, might well be regarded by her Majesty's Government as a departure from the letter and spirit of the treaty." Mr. Fish went still farther: "In the President's opinion, such a course on his party might justify the British Government in remonstrating, and possibly in hesitating as to its future relations to the Commission." The rebuke was not too severe, because if the matter was to be left to the judgment of the people of Canada, it would have been far wiser to remand the negotiation originally to the authorities of the Dominion, with whom the United States could probably have come to an agreement much more readily than with the Imperial Government. On the 24th of September Sir Edward advised Mr. Fish that he was instructed by Earl Granville to propose that "the Ministers of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670  
671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Government

 

United

 

States

 

treaty

 

objected

 

Edward

 
nomination
 

Canada

 
Delfosse
 

September


Washington

 
originally
 
Ministers
 
Granville
 

President

 
opinion
 

people

 
Majesty
 

Dominion

 

proposing


relations
 

intended

 

filling

 

commission

 

regarded

 

Britain

 

letter

 

farther

 
spirit
 

departure


concur

 

conjoint

 

refusal

 

contemplated

 

ground

 

fishermen

 

Gloucester

 

primary

 
instance
 
interest

British
 

negotiation

 
authorities
 
agreement
 

instructed

 
propose
 

advised

 

readily

 

Imperial

 
remand