FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  
nuine one; and for this very reason it was not accepted by Ibn Ishak or even by Wakidi, so prone to the recital of apocryphal traditions. [Sidenote: 56. Irving and Muir quoted: concluding remarks.] Referring to the above attempted assassination Mr. Washington Irving says: "During this period of his career Mahomet in more than one instance narrowly escaped falling by the hand of an assassin. He himself is charged with the use of insidious means to rid himself of an enemy, for it is said that he sent Amru Ibn Omeya on a secret errand to Mecca, to assassinate Abu Sofian, but the plot was discovered, and the assassin only escaped by rapid flight. The charge, however, is not well substantiated, and is contrary to his general character and conduct."[230] Sir W. Muir writes: "There is just a shadow of possibility that the tradition may have been fabricated by the anti-Omeyad party to throw odium on the memory of Abu Sofian, as having been deemed by Mahomet worthy of death. But this is not to be put against the evidence of unanimous and apparently independent traditions."[231] But, in fact, there are no unanimous and apparently independent traditions of the command of Mohammad to assassinate Abu Sofian; there is only one and but one, by Ibn Sad, which is wholly unreliable, and that too from the lips of the would-be assassin himself who before the introduction of Islam was a professional cutthroat, whose narration, therefore, deserves not our belief. Even if it be taken for granted that Mohammad did send some one to assassinate Abu Sofian, who had already sent some one to assassinate Mohammad as related by Ibn Sad, it was justified in self-defence. It was a measure for retaliation, not one of mere revenge, but only a means of protective retribution, which is lawful under the military law.[232] [Footnote 205: Selections from the Kur-an by Edward William Lane, with an Introduction by Stanley Lane Poole. Intro., p. xliv: Truebner & Co., London, 1879.] [Footnote 206: Islam under the Arabs, by R.D. Osborn, p. 60, London, 1876.] [Footnote 207: Wakidi's Campaigns of Mohammad, pp. 172 & 173: Calcutta Baptist Mission Press; edited by A. Von Kremer.] [Footnote 208: Sir W. Muir writes that "Hishami says, that Mahomet, being vexed by Asma's verses, said _publicly_, 'Who will rid me of this woman?'" But there is no such word in Ibn Hisham which may be rendered '_publicly_.'] [Footnote 209: Ibn Hisham, p. 994. Wakidi does
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
Sofian
 

Mohammad

 
assassinate
 
assassin
 

Mahomet

 

traditions

 

Wakidi

 
London
 
apparently

writes
 

unanimous

 

independent

 

Hisham

 

escaped

 

publicly

 

Irving

 

related

 
verses
 
revenge

protective

 

retaliation

 

measure

 

defence

 

justified

 

deserves

 
narration
 
belief
 

granted

 
retribution

rendered

 
Hishami
 

Calcutta

 
Baptist
 
Truebner
 

Mission

 
cutthroat
 

Osborn

 

Campaigns

 
Kremer

lawful

 

military

 

Introduction

 

Stanley

 

edited

 

William

 
Selections
 

Edward

 

worthy

 

narrowly