FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961  
962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   >>   >|  
by the finite verb, or affected by the action affirmed. Lowth says, "In English the nominative case, denoting the agent, usually goes before the verb, or attribution; and the objective case, denoting the object, follows the verb active."--_Short Introd._, p. 72. Murray copies, but not literally, thus: "The nominative denotes the subject, and usually goes before the verb [,] or attribute; and the word _or phrase_, denoting the object, follows the verb: as, 'A wise man governs his passions.' Here, a _wise man_ is the subject; _governs_, the attribute, or thing affirmed; and _his passions_, the object."--_Murray's Octavo_, p. 142; _Duodecimo_, 116. To include thus the adjuncts with their principals, as the logicians do, is _here_ manifestly improper; because it unites what the grammatical analyzer is chiefly concerned to separate, and tends to defeat the main purpose for which "THE PRINCIPAL PARTS" are so named and distinguished. OBS. 4.--The Third Method of Analysis, described above, is an attempt very briefly to epitomize the chief elements of a great scheme,--to give, in a nutshell, the substance of what our grammarians have borrowed from the logicians, then mixed with something of their own, next amplified with small details, and, in some instances, branched out and extended to enormous bulk and length. Of course, they have not failed to set forth the comparative merits of this scheme in a sufficiently favourable light. The two ingenious gentlemen who seem to have been chiefly instrumental in making it popular, say in their preface, "The rules of syntax contained in this work result directly from the analysis of propositions, and of compound sentences; and for this reason the student should make himself perfectly familiar with the sections relating to _subject_ and _predicate_, and should be able readily to analyze sentences, whether simple or compound, and to explain their structure and connection. * * * This exercise _should always precede_ the more minute and subsidiary labor of parsing. If the latter be conducted, as it often is, independently of previous analysis, the _principal advantage_ to be derived from the study of language, as an intellectual exercise, will inevitably be lost."--_Latin Grammar of Andrews and Stoddard_, p. vi. N. Butler, who bestows upon this subject about a dozen duodecimo pages, says in his preface, "The rules for the analysis of sentences, which is a _very useful and interesting_ exercis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961  
962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
subject
 

analysis

 

sentences

 
object
 
denoting
 

nominative

 
passions
 

governs

 
logicians
 

scheme


affirmed

 

preface

 

chiefly

 

compound

 

Murray

 

exercise

 
attribute
 

predicate

 

relating

 

reason


student

 
familiar
 

sections

 

perfectly

 

favourable

 
ingenious
 

sufficiently

 

merits

 

failed

 

comparative


gentlemen

 

contained

 

result

 

directly

 

syntax

 
popular
 
instrumental
 

making

 

propositions

 

subsidiary


Grammar

 

Andrews

 

Stoddard

 
inevitably
 

language

 
intellectual
 

interesting

 

exercis

 

duodecimo

 

Butler