FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960  
961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   >>   >|  
d above,--and also, in a few, some succinct account of the parts called "_adjuncts_;" but there seems to have been no prevalent practice of applying these principles, in any stated or well-digested manner. Lowth, Murray, Alger, W. Allen, Hart, Hiley, Ingersoll, Wells, and others, tell of these "PRINCIPAL PARTS;"--Lowth calling them, "the _agent_, the _attribute_, and the _object_;" (_Gram._, p. 72;)--Murray, and his copyists, Alger, Ingersoll, and others, calling them, "the _subject_, the _attribute_, and the _object_;"--Hiley and Hart calling them, "the _subject_ or _nominative_, the _attribute_ or _verb_, and the _object_;"--Allen calling them, "the _nominative_, the _verb_, and (if the verb is active,) the _accusative_ governed by the verb;" and also saying, "The nominative is sometimes called the _subject_; the verb, the _attribute_; and the accusative, the _object_;"--Wells calling them, "the _subject_ or _nominative_, the _verb_, and the _object_;" and also recognizing the "_adjuncts_," as a species which "embraces all the words of a simple sentence [,] except the _principal parts_;"--yet not more than two of them all appearing to have taken any thought, and they but little, about the formal _application_ of their common doctrine. In Allen's English Grammar, which is one of the best, and likewise in Wells's, which is equally prized, this reduction of all connected words, or parts of speech, into "the principal parts" and "the adjuncts," is fully recognized; the adjuncts, too, are discriminated by Allen, as "either primary or secondary," nor are their more particular species or relations overlooked; but I find no method prescribed for the analysis intended, except what Wells adopted in his early editions but has since changed to an other or abandoned, and no other allusion to it by, Allen, than this Note, which, with some appearance of intrusion, is appended to his "Method of Parsing the Infinitive Mood:"--"The pupil _may now begin_ to analyse [_analyze_] the sentences, by distinguishing the principal words and their adjuncts."--_W. Allen's E. Gram._, p. 258. OBS. 3.--These authors in general, and many more, tell us, with some variation of words, that the agent, subject, or nominative, is that of which something is said, affirmed, or denied; that the attribute, verb, or predicate, is that which is said, affirmed, or denied, of the subject; and that the object, accusative, or case sequent, is that which is introduced
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960  
961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
object
 
subject
 
attribute
 

nominative

 

calling

 

adjuncts

 

accusative

 

principal

 

species

 

Murray


denied

 
Ingersoll
 
called
 

affirmed

 
relations
 

allusion

 

abandoned

 

adopted

 

intended

 

analysis


appearance
 
editions
 

changed

 

method

 
prescribed
 
overlooked
 
analyse
 

authors

 

general

 

predicate


variation

 

distinguishing

 

secondary

 

Infinitive

 

Parsing

 

appended

 

Method

 

introduced

 
sequent
 
sentences

analyze
 

intrusion

 

thought

 

copyists

 

manner

 
PRINCIPAL
 
active
 

governed

 

simple

 

sentence