FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368  
369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   >>   >|  
ood it "may be suppressed." Nay, it must be suppressed, if, without such suppression, the public order may not be sustained; for, as we have abundantly seen, it is only in the bosom of an enlightened public order that liberty can live, or move, or have its being. Thus, as Montesquieu advises, we deduce an inequality from the very principle of equality itself; since, if such inequality be not deduced and established by law, a still more terrific inequality would be forced upon us. Blind passion would dictate the laws, and brute force would reign, while innocence and virtue would be trampled in the dust. Such is the inequality to which the honorable senators would invite us; and that, too, by an appeal to our love of equality! If we decline the invitation, this is not because we are the enemies, but because we are the friends, of human freedom. It is not because we love equality less, but liberty more. The legislators of the North may, if they please, choose the principle of equality as the very "element and guarantee" of their liberty; and, to make that liberty perfect, they may apply it to every possible "subject of legislation," and to "every question" under the sun. But, if we may be permitted to choose for ourselves, we should beg to be delivered from such an extreme equality. We should reject it as the very worst "element," and the very surest "guarantee" of an unbounded licentiousness and an intolerable oppression. As the "element and guarantee" of freedom for ourselves, and for our posterity, we should decidedly prefer the principle of an enlightened public order. FOOTNOTES: [142] Channing's Works, vol. ii. p. 126. [143] Elements of Moral Science, Part ii. chap. i. sec. 11. [144] Moral Science, Part ii. chap. i. sec. 2. [145] Letters on Slavery, p. 89. [146] Ibid, p. 92. [147] Letters, p. 50. [148] Letters, p. 50. [149] Letters, p. 50. [150] Letters, p. 113. [151] Moral Science, Part ii. chap. i. sec. 2. [152] Letters, p. 119, 120. [153] Moral Science Part ii. chap. i. sec. 2. [154] Moral Science, Part ii. chap. i. sec. 2. [155] Ibid. [156] The _Italics_ are our own. [157] Lev. chap. xxv. [158] Exod. chap. xxi. [159] In the first chapter. [160] Mr. Chase, of Ohio. [161] "By nature," in the Original Bill of Rights. [162] Mr. Seward, of New York. CHAPTER III. THE ARGUMENT FROM THE SCRIPTURES. The Argument from the Old Testament.--The Argument from t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368  
369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Letters

 

Science

 
equality
 

liberty

 

inequality

 

principle

 
public
 
element
 

guarantee

 

choose


freedom
 
Argument
 
suppressed
 

enlightened

 

Slavery

 

Elements

 
FOOTNOTES
 

prefer

 

decidedly

 

posterity


Channing

 

Original

 

Rights

 

nature

 

Seward

 

SCRIPTURES

 

Testament

 

ARGUMENT

 

CHAPTER

 

chapter


Italics

 

oppression

 

terrific

 

forced

 

deduced

 
established
 
passion
 

dictate

 

innocence

 

virtue


trampled
 
sustained
 

abundantly

 

suppression

 

Montesquieu

 

advises

 
deduce
 

question

 
legislation
 

subject