FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318  
319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   >>   >|  
Cassianus was the founder. Docetism, however, undoubtedly existed before the time of Cassianus. The origin of the heresy is to be sought in the Greek, Alexandrine and Oriental philosophizing about the imperfection or rather the essential impurity of matter. Traces of a Jewish Docetism are to be found in Philo; and in the Christian form it is generally supposed to be combated in the writings of John,[2] and more formally in the epistles of Ignatius.[3] It differed much in its complexion according to the points of view adopted by the different authors. Among the Gnostics and Manichaeans it existed in its most developed type, and in a milder form it is to be found even in the writings of the orthodox teachers. The more thoroughgoing Docetae assumed the position that Christ was born without any participation of matter; and that all the acts and sufferings of his human life, including the crucifixion, were only apparent. They denied accordingly, the resurrection and the ascent into heaven. To this class belonged Dositheus, Saturninus, Cerdo, Marcion and their followers, the Ophites, Manichaeans and others. Marcion, for example, regarded the body of Christ merely as an "umbra," a "phantasma." His denial (due to his abhorrence of the world) that Jesus was born or subjected to human development, is in striking contrast to the value which he sets on Christ's death on the cross. The other, or milder school of Docetae, attributed to Christ an ethereal and heavenly instead of a truly human body. Amongst these were Valentinus, Bardesanes, Basilides, Tatian and their followers. They varied considerably in their estimation of the share which this body had in the real actions and sufferings of Christ. Clement and Origen, at the head of the Alexandrian school, took a somewhat subtle view of the Incarnation, and Docetism pervades their controversies with the Monarchians. Hilary especially illustrates the prevalence of naive Docetic views as regards the details of the Incarnation. Docetic tendencies have also been developed in later periods of ecclesiastical history, as for example by the Priscillianists and the Bogomils, and also since the Reformation by Jacob Boehme, Menno Simons and a small fraction of the Anabaptists. Docetism springs from the same roots as Gnosticism, and the Gnostics generally held Docetic views (see GNOSTICISM). FOOTNOTES: [1] Not a distinct sect, but a continuous type of Christology. Hippolytus, howev
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318  
319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christ

 

Docetism

 

Docetic

 

Docetae

 
Gnostics
 

developed

 

milder

 

Manichaeans

 
Incarnation
 

school


followers
 
sufferings
 

Marcion

 

matter

 

Cassianus

 

generally

 

existed

 

writings

 

Hilary

 

Origen


actions
 

illustrates

 

Clement

 

Alexandrian

 

pervades

 

Monarchians

 
undoubtedly
 
subtle
 

controversies

 
estimation

attributed

 

ethereal

 
heavenly
 

Amongst

 

varied

 
considerably
 
prevalence
 

Tatian

 

Basilides

 

Valentinus


Bardesanes

 

Gnosticism

 

GNOSTICISM

 
Anabaptists
 

springs

 
FOOTNOTES
 

Christology

 

Hippolytus

 

continuous

 
distinct