FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  
royal seed,_" concluding with "_living like gods, to die like men,_" from Jeremy Taylor's _Holy Dying_; and from Francis Beaumont-- "_Here's an acre sown indeed_ _With the richest royalest seed._ . . . . . . _Though gods they were, as men they died._" Which of these twain borrowed the "royal seed" from the other, is a manner of little moment; but the correspondence of living as gods, and dying as men, both undoubtedly taken from Holy Scripture; the phrase occurring in either Testament: "I have said, Ye are gods ... But ye shall die like men" (Psalm lxxxii. 6, 7.); quoted by our Saviour (John, x. 34.): "Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are Gods?" J. G. M. Hallamshire. _Cause of Rarity of William IV.'s Copper Coinage._--The copper coinage of William IV. is become so scarce, that possibly a doubt may some day arise, whether any but a very limited issue of it was ever made; it may be well, therefore, to introduce a _note_ on the cause of its disappearance, while the subject is comparatively recent. When the copper coins of the last reign appeared, a slight tinge in the colour of the metal excited the suspicion of those accustomed to examine such things, that it contained gold, which proved to be the fact; hence their real value was greater than that for which they passed current, and they were speedily collected and melted down by manufacturers, principally, I believe, as an alloy to gold, whereby every particle of that metal which they contained was turned to account. I have been told that various Birmingham establishments had agents in different parts of the country, appointed to collect this coinage. R. C. H. _Burnet._--In the list of conflicting judgments on Burnet, quoted by your correspondents (Vol. i., pp. 40. 120. 181. 341. 493.), I find no reference to the opinion of his contemporary, Bishop Nicolson. That writer takes a somewhat partial view of the character and merits of the historian, and canvasses, by anticipation, much of what has been urged against him by our more modern critics. But, as the weight of authorities already cited appears to militate against Burnet, I am induced to send you some of Bishop Nicolson's remarks, for the sake of those readers who may not have immediate access to them. I quote from his _English Historical Library_, 2nd edition, p. 119.: "In the months of December and January in the year following (1680
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Burnet

 

living

 

coinage

 

contained

 

copper

 

quoted

 

Nicolson

 

Bishop

 

William

 
conflicting

judgments
 
correspondents
 

turned

 
particle
 

principally

 
manufacturers
 
current
 

passed

 

speedily

 

collected


melted

 

account

 
appointed
 
country
 

collect

 

Birmingham

 

establishments

 

agents

 

readers

 

access


remarks

 

militate

 

appears

 

induced

 

English

 

January

 

December

 
months
 

Library

 

Historical


edition

 

partial

 
character
 

writer

 

reference

 

opinion

 
contemporary
 
merits
 

historian

 
modern