FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
or vocative, the only permitted uses at present, would have been incorrect. Even such phrases as "Put _them_ things away"; or "The man _what_ owns the horse" are not bad, but only antiquated English{141}. Saying this, I would not in the least imply that these forms are open to you to employ, or that they would be good English for _you_. They would not; inasmuch as they are contrary to present use and custom, and these must be our standards in what we speak, and in what we write; just as in our buying and selling we are bound to employ the current coin of the realm, must not attempt to pass that which long since has been called in, whatever merits or intrinsic value it may possess. All which I affirm is that the phrases just brought forward represent past stages of the language, and are not barbarous violations of it. {Sidenote: _Luncheon_, _Nuncheon_} The same may be asserted of certain ways of pronouncing words, which are now in use among the lower classes, but not among the higher; as, for example, 'contr{-a}ry', 'mischi{-e}vous', 'blasph{-e}mous', instead of 'contr{)a}ry', 'mischi{)e}vous', 'blasph{)e}mous'. It would be abundantly easy to show by a multitude of quotations from our poets, and those reaching very far down, that these are merely the retention of the earlier pronunciation by the people, after the higher classes have abandoned it{142}. And on the strength of what has just been spoken, let me here suggest to you how well worth your while it will prove to be on the watch for provincial words and inflexions, local idioms and modes of pronunciation, and to take note of these. Count nothing in this kind beneath your notice. Do not at once ascribe anything which you hear to the ignorance or stupidity of the speaker. Thus if you hear 'nuncheon', do not at once set it down for a malformation of 'luncheon'{143}, nor 'yeel'{144}, of 'eel'. Lists and collections of provincial usage, such as I have suggested, always have their value. If you are not able to turn them to any profit yourselves, and they may not stand in close enough connexion with your own studies for this, yet there always are those who will thank you for them; and to whom the humblest of these collections, carefully and intelligently made, will be in one way or another of real assistance{145}. And there is the more need to urge this at the present, because, notwithstanding the tenacity with which our country folk cling to their old forms and usages
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
present
 

classes

 

higher

 
provincial
 

collections

 

mischi

 
pronunciation
 

blasph

 

English

 
phrases

employ

 

speaker

 

nuncheon

 
stupidity
 
ignorance
 

ascribe

 

country

 

malformation

 
luncheon
 

usages


inflexions

 

things

 

idioms

 

beneath

 

notice

 

humblest

 

carefully

 

intelligently

 

vocative

 

assistance


studies

 

permitted

 
suggested
 

incorrect

 

tenacity

 
connexion
 

notwithstanding

 

profit

 

stages

 

language


barbarous

 

represent

 
forward
 

affirm

 

brought

 
violations
 

Sidenote

 
pronouncing
 
asserted
 
Luncheon