1891. _On Home Rule for Ireland_.
1910. _Essays in Criticism_ (Third Series).
For a complete bibliography of Arnold's writings and of Arnold
criticism, see _Bibliography of Matthew Arnold_, by T.B. Smart, London,
1892. The letters of Matthew Arnold, 1848-88, were edited by G.W.E.
Russell in 1896.
CRITICISM OF ARNOLD'S PROSE.
BIRRELL, AUGUSTINE: _Res Judicatae_, London, 1892.
BROWNELL, W.C.: _Victorian Prose Masters_, New York, 1902.
BURROUGHS, JOHN: _Indoor Studies_, Boston, 1889.
DAWSON, W.H.: _Matthew Arnold and his Relation to the Thought of our
Time_, New York, 1904.
FITCH, SIR JOSHUA: _Thomas and Matthew Arnold and their Influence on
English Education_, New York, 1897.
GATES, L.E.: _Selections from the Prose Writings of Matthew Arnold_, New
York, 1898.
HARRISON, FREDERIC: _Culture; A Dialogue_. In _The Choice of Books_,
London, 1886.
HUTTON, R.H.: _Modern Guides of English Thought in Matters of Faith_,
London, 1887.
JACOBS, JOSEPH: _Literary Studies_, London, 1895.
PAUL, HERBERT W.: _Matthew Arnold_. In _English Men of Letters Series_,
London and New York, 1902.
ROBERTSON, JOHN M.: _Modern Humanists_, London, 1891.
RUSSELL, G.W.E.: _Matthew Arnold_, New York, 1904.
SAINTSBURY, GEORGE: _Corrected Impressions_, London, 1895. _Matthew
Arnold_. In _Modern English Writers Series_, London, 1899.
SHAIRP, J.C.: _Culture and Religion_, Edinburgh, 1870.
SPEDDING, JAMES: _Reviews and Discussions_, London, 1879.
STEPHEN, SIR LESLIE: _Studies of a Biographer_, vol. 2, London, 1898.
WOODBERRY, GEORGE E.: _Makers of Literature_, London, 1900.
~SELECTIONS FROM MATTHEW ARNOLD~
I. THEORIES OF LITERATURE AND CRITICISM
POETRY AND THE CLASSICS[1]
In two small volumes of Poems, published anonymously, one in 1849, the
other in 1852, many of the Poems which compose the present volume have
already appeared. The rest are now published for the first time.
I have, in the present collection, omitted the poem[2] from which the
volume published in 1852 took its title. I have done so, not because the
subject of it was a Sicilian Greek born between two and three thousand
years ago, although many persons would think this a sufficient reason.
Neither have I done so because I had, in my own opinion, failed in the
delineation which I intended to effect. I intended to delineate the
feelings of one of the last of the Greek religious philosophers, one of
the family of Orpheus a
|