FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703  
704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   >>   >|  
sarily be rounded, or convex, above. Secondly, that the waters above the firmament are not fluid, but exist outside it in a solid state, as a mass of ice, and that this is the crystalline heaven of some writers. Reply Obj. 3: According to the third opinion given, the waters above the firmament have been raised in the form of vapors, and serve to give rain to the earth. But according to the second opinion, they are above the heaven that is wholly transparent and starless. This, according to some, is the primary mobile, the cause of the daily revolution of the entire heaven, whereby the continuance of generation is secured. In the same way the starry heaven, by the zodiacal movement, is the cause whereby different bodies are generated or corrupted, through the rising and setting of the stars, and their various influences. But according to the first opinion these waters are set there to temper the heat of the celestial bodies, as Basil supposes (Hom. iii in Hexaem.). And Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. ii, 5) that some have considered this to be proved by the extreme cold of Saturn owing to its nearness to the waters that are above the firmament. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 68, Art. 3] Whether the Firmament Divides Waters from Waters? Objection 1: It would seem that the firmament does not divide waters from waters. For bodies that are of one and the same species have naturally one and the same place. But the Philosopher says (Topic. i, 6): "All water is the same species." Water therefore cannot be distinct from water by place. Obj. 2: Further, should it be said that the waters above the firmament differ in species from those under the firmament, it may be argued, on the contrary, that things distinct in species need nothing else to distinguish them. If then, these waters differ in species, it is not the firmament that distinguishes them. Obj. 3: Further, it would appear that what distinguishes waters from waters must be something which is in contact with them on either side, as a wall standing in the midst of a river. But it is evident that the waters below do not reach up to the firmament. Therefore the firmament does not divide the waters from the waters. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Gen. 1:6): "Let there be a firmament made amidst the waters; and let it divide the waters from the waters." _I answer that,_ The text of Genesis, considered superficially, might lead to the adoption of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703  
704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
waters
 

firmament

 

species

 

heaven

 

bodies

 

divide

 
opinion
 

distinguishes

 

differ

 

Further


distinct
 

Waters

 

contrary

 
considered
 
Objection
 
Divides
 

Firmament

 
Whether
 

naturally

 

Philosopher


Therefore

 

written

 

evident

 

amidst

 

superficially

 
adoption
 

Genesis

 
answer
 

distinguish

 

argued


things

 

standing

 

contact

 

wholly

 
vapors
 

transparent

 
starless
 

entire

 

continuance

 

generation


revolution

 

primary

 

mobile

 
raised
 

Secondly

 
sarily
 
rounded
 

convex

 
According
 
writers