FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457  
458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   >>  
ason already intimated, it should be thought too extensive, it might be qualified with a limitation to such causes only as are determinable at common law in that mode of trial. The amount of the observations hitherto made on the authority of the judicial department is this: that it has been carefully restricted to those causes which are manifestly proper for the cognizance of the national judicature; that in the partition of this authority a very small portion of original jurisdiction has been preserved to the Supreme Court, and the rest consigned to the subordinate tribunals; that the Supreme Court will possess an appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, in all the cases referred to them, both subject to any exceptions and regulations which may be thought advisable; that this appellate jurisdiction does, in no case, abolish the trial by jury; and that an ordinary degree of prudence and integrity in the national councils will insure us solid advantages from the establishment of the proposed judiciary, without exposing us to any of the inconveniences which have been predicted from that source. PUBLIUS 1. Article 3, Sec. 1. 2. This power has been absurdly represented as intended to abolish all the county courts in the several States, which are commonly called inferior courts. But the expressions of the Constitution are, to constitute "tribunals INFERIOR TO THE SUPREME COURT"; and the evident design of the provision is to enable the institution of local courts, subordinate to the Supreme, either in States or larger districts. It is ridiculous to imagine that county courts were in contemplation. 3. This word is composed of JUS and DICTIO, juris dictio or a speaking and pronouncing of the law. 4. I hold that the States will have concurrent jurisdiction with the subordinate federal judicatories, in many cases of federal cognizance, as will be explained in my next paper. FEDERALIST No. 82 The Judiciary Continued. From McLEAN's Edition, New York. Wednesday, May 28, 1788 HAMILTON To the People of the State of New York: THE erection of a new government, whatever care or wisdom may distinguish the work, cannot fail to originate questions of intricacy and nicety; and these may, in a particular manner, be expected to flow from the establishment of a constitution founded upon the total or partial incorporation of a number of distinct sovereignties. 'Tis time only that can mature and perfect
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457  
458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   >>  



Top keywords:

courts

 

jurisdiction

 

Supreme

 
subordinate
 

States

 
county
 

cognizance

 
national
 

federal

 
establishment

abolish

 
appellate
 
tribunals
 
thought
 

authority

 
explained
 

concurrent

 

intimated

 

judicatories

 
FEDERALIST

McLEAN

 

Continued

 
Judiciary
 

districts

 

ridiculous

 

imagine

 

larger

 

institution

 

contemplation

 

dictio


speaking

 

pronouncing

 

Edition

 
DICTIO
 

composed

 

Wednesday

 
constitution
 

founded

 
expected
 

manner


nicety

 
partial
 

mature

 
perfect
 

sovereignties

 

incorporation

 
number
 

distinct

 

intricacy

 

questions