FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089  
2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   >>   >|  
et the Southern States import slaves, than to part with them, if they made that a _sine qua non_. He was opposed to a tax on slaves imported, as making the matter worse, because it implied they were _property_. He acknowledged that if the power of prohibiting the importation should be given to the General Government, that it would be exercised. He thought it would be its duty to exercise the power. Mr. READ was for the commitment, provided the clause concerning taxes on exports should also be committed. Mr. SHERMAN observed that that clause had been agreed to, and therefore could not be committed. Mr. Randolph was for committing, in order that some middle ground might, if possible, be found. He could never agree to the clause as it stands. He would sooner risk the Constitution. He dwelt on the dilemma to which the Convention was exposed. By agreeing to the clause, it would revolt the Quakers, the Methodists, and many others in the States having no slaves. On the other hand, two States might be lost to the Union. Let us then, he said, try the chance of a commitment. On the question for committing the remaining part of Sections 4 and 5, of Article 7,--Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye--7; New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Delaware, no--3; Massachusetts absent. Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Langdon moved to commit Section 6, as to a navigation act by two-thirds of each House. Mr. Gorham did not see the propriety of it. Is it meant to require a greater proportion of votes? He desired it to be remembered, that the Eastern States had no motive to union but a commercial one. They were able to protect themselves. They were not afraid of external danger, and did not need the aid of the Southern States. Mr. Wilson wished for a commitment, in order to reduce the proportion of votes required. Mr. Ellsworth was for taking the plan as it is. This widening of opinions had a threatening aspect. If we do not agree on this middle and moderate ground, he was afraid we should lose two States, with such others as may be disposed to stand aloof; should fly into a variety of shapes and directions, and most probably into several confederations,--and not without bloodshed. On the question for committing Section 6, as to a navigation act, to a member from each State,--New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, ay
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089  
2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
Carolina
 

clause

 

committing

 

commitment

 

slaves

 

committed

 

proportion

 

afraid

 

ground


middle

 

Massachusetts

 

question

 

Hampshire

 

Maryland

 

Georgia

 

Virginia

 

Pennsylvania

 

Section

 

Southern


navigation

 

Delaware

 

motive

 

absent

 

remembered

 

greater

 

desired

 

Eastern

 
require
 

Gorham


thirds

 

propriety

 
Langdon
 

commit

 

Pinckney

 

wished

 

variety

 

shapes

 

disposed

 

moderate


directions

 

member

 
bloodshed
 

confederations

 

Wilson

 
reduce
 

danger

 

external

 

protect

 
required