FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066  
2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   >>   >|  
terial to future harmony and justice among the members of the Confederacy. The deduction of two-fifths was a compromise between the wide opinions and demands of the Southern and other States.--_p. 523_. * * * * * _Extract from "Debates in the Federal Convention" of 1787, for the formation of the Constitution of the United States_. TUESDAY, May 29, 1787. Mr. CHARLES PINCKNEY laid before the House the draft of a Federal Government. * * * "The proportion of direct taxation shall be regulated by the whole number of inhabitants of every description"--_pp_. 735, 741. WEDNESDAY, May 30, 1787. The following Resolution, being the second of those proposed by Mr. RANDOLPH, was taken up, viz. "_That the rights of suffrage in the National Legislature ought to be proportioned to the quotas of contribution, or to the number of free inhabitants, as the one or the other rule may seem best in different cases_." Colonel HAMILTON moved to alter the resolution so as to read, "that the rights of suffrage in the National Legislature ought to be proportioned to the number of free inhabitants." Mr. SPAIGHT seconded the motion.--_p_. 750. WEDNESDAY, June 6, 1787. Mr. MADISON. We have seen the mere distinction of color made, in the most enlightened period of time, a ground of the most oppressive dominion ever exercised by man over man.--_p_. 806. MONDAY, June 11, 1787. Mr. SHERMAN proposed, that the proportion of suffrage in the first branch should be according to the respective numbers of free inhabitants; Mr. RUTLEDGE proposed, that the proportion of suffrage in the first branch should be according to the quotas of contribution. Mr. KING and Mr. WILSON, in order to bring the question to a point, moved, "that the right of suffrage in the first branch of the National Legislature ought not to be according to the rule established in the Articles of Confederation, but according to some equitable ratio of representation."--_p_. 836. It was then moved by Mr. RUTLEDGE, seconded by Mr. BUTLER, to add to the words, "equitable ratio of representation," at the end of the motion just agreed to, the words "according to the quotas of contribution." On motion of Mr. WILSON, seconded by Mr. PINCKNEY, this was postponed; in order to add, after the words, "equitable ratio of representation," the words following: "In proportion to the whole number of white and other free citizens and inhabitants of ev
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066  
2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
suffrage
 

inhabitants

 

proportion

 

number

 

National

 

Legislature

 

proposed

 

quotas

 

contribution

 

branch


seconded
 
equitable
 

representation

 

motion

 

WILSON

 
WEDNESDAY
 

RUTLEDGE

 
proportioned
 
rights
 

Federal


States
 

PINCKNEY

 
respective
 

fifths

 

compromise

 
SHERMAN
 

numbers

 

deduction

 

members

 

Confederacy


MONDAY

 
oppressive
 

dominion

 

ground

 

period

 

opinions

 
exercised
 

enlightened

 

agreed

 
future

terial

 
citizens
 

postponed

 
BUTLER
 

Articles

 

Confederation

 

established

 

distinction

 

harmony

 

justice