FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065  
2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   >>   >|  
aye; Pennsylvania, aye; Delaware, no; Maryland, aye; Virginia, aye; North Carolina, aye; South Carolina, no; so the clause was struck out. The arguments used by those who were for rating slaves high were, that the expense of feeding and clothing them was as far below that incident to freemen as their industry and ingenuity were below those of freemen; and that the warm climate within which the States having slaves lay, compared with the rigorous climate and inferior fertility of the others, ought to have great weight in the case; and that the exports of the former States were greater than of the latter. On the other side, it was said, that slaves were not put to labor as young as the children of laboring families; that, having no interest in their labor, they did as little as possible, and omitted every exertion of thought requisite to facilitate and expedite it; that if the exports of the States having slaves exceeded those of the others, their imports were in proportion, slaves employed wholly in agriculture, not in manufactures; and that, in fact, the balance of trade formerly was much more against the Southern States than the others. On the main question, New Hampshire, aye; Massachusetts, no; Rhode Island, no; Connecticut, no; New York (Mr. FLOYD, aye;) New Jersey, aye; Delaware, no; Maryland, aye; Virginia, aye; North Carolina, aye; South Carolina, no.--_pp. 423-4-5_. TUESDAY, April l, 1783. Congress resumed the Report on Revenue, &c. Mr. HAMILTON, who had been absent when the last question was taken for substituting numbers in place of the value of land, moved to reconsider that vote. He was seconded by Mr. OSGOOD. Those who voted differently from their former votes were influenced by the conviction of the necessity of the change, and despair on both sides of a more favorable rate of the slaves. The rate of three-fifths was agreed to without opposition.--_p. 430_. MONDAY, MAY 26, 1783. The Resolutions on the Journal instructing the ministers in Europe to remonstrate against the carrying off the negroes--also those for furloughing the troops--passed _unanimously.--p. 456._ * * * * * _Letter from Mr. Madison to Edmund Randolph_. PHILADELPHIA, April 8, 1783. A change of the valuation of lands for the number of inhabitants, deducting two-fifths of the slaves, has received a tacit sanction, and, unless hereafter expunged, will go forth in the general recommendation, as ma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065  
2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slaves

 
Carolina
 

States

 

question

 

freemen

 

change

 

climate

 

Maryland

 

fifths

 

exports


Delaware

 

Virginia

 

favorable

 

agreed

 

despair

 

conviction

 

necessity

 

influenced

 

substituting

 

numbers


absent

 

HAMILTON

 

seconded

 

OSGOOD

 

reconsider

 

differently

 

inhabitants

 

deducting

 
number
 

PHILADELPHIA


valuation

 

received

 
general
 

recommendation

 

sanction

 

expunged

 

Randolph

 

Edmund

 

instructing

 

ministers


Europe

 

remonstrate

 
Journal
 

Resolutions

 

MONDAY

 
carrying
 

unanimously

 

Letter

 

Madison

 
passed