FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073  
2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   >>   >|  
difficulty then was, to satisfy them that the negroes ought not to have been counted equally with the whites, instead of being counted in the ratio of three-fifths only.[1] [Footnote 1: They were then to have been a rule of taxation only.] Mr. WILSON did not well see, on what principle the admission of blacks in the proportion of three-fifths could be explained. Are they admitted as citizens--then why are they not admitted on an equality with white citizens? Are they admitted as property--then why is not other property admitted into the computation? These were difficulties, however, which he thought must be overruled by the necessity of compromise. He had some apprehensions also, from the tendency of the blending of the blacks with the whites, to give disgust to the people of Pennsylvania, as had been intimated by his colleague (Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS.) Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS was compelled to declare himself reduced to the dilemma of doing injustice to the Southern States, or to human nature; and he must therefore do it to the former. For he could never agree to give such encouragement to the slave trade, as would be given by allowing them a representation for their negroes; and he did not believe those States would ever confederate on terms that would deprive them of that trade. On the question for agreeing to include three-fifths of the blacks,--Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, aye--4; Massachusetts, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland,[2] South Carolina, no--6.--_pp_.1076-7-8. [Footnote 2: Mr. Carroll said, in explanation of the vote of Maryland, that he wished the _phraseology_ to be so altered as to obviate, if possible, the danger which had been expressed of giving umbrage to the Eastern and Middle States.] THURSDAY, July 12, 1787. _In Convention_,--Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS moved a proviso, "that taxation shall be in proportion to representation." Mr. BUTLER contended again, that representation should be according to the full number of inhabitants, including all the blacks; admitting the justice of Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS'S motion. General PINCKNEY was alarmed at what was said yesterday, [by GOUVERNEUR MORRIS] concerning the negroes. He was now again alarmed at what had been thrown out concerning the taxing of exports. South Carolina has in one year exported to the amount of 600,000L. sterling, all which was the fruit of the labor of her blacks. Will she be represented
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073  
2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

blacks

 

MORRIS

 
GOUVERNEUR
 

admitted

 

negroes

 

representation

 

fifths

 

States

 

Carolina

 

alarmed


property

 

Pennsylvania

 

counted

 

citizens

 

Maryland

 

Footnote

 
proportion
 

taxation

 

whites

 

danger


expressed

 

Massachusetts

 

umbrage

 

THURSDAY

 
Middle
 

Eastern

 

giving

 
altered
 

wished

 
explanation

Delaware
 
phraseology
 

Carroll

 

Jersey

 

obviate

 

inhabitants

 

taxing

 
exports
 
thrown
 

PINCKNEY


yesterday

 
sterling
 
exported
 

amount

 

General

 

motion

 
proviso
 

BUTLER

 

represented

 

Convention