FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077  
2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   >>   >|  
and adjust the resolution to that requiring periodical revisions according to the number of whites and three-fifths of the blacks. Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS (of Pennsylvania) opposed the alteration, as leaving still an incoherence. If negroes were to be viewed as inhabitants, and the revision was to proceed on the principle of numbers of inhabitants, they ought to be added in their entire number, and not in the proportion of three-fifths. If as property, the word wealth was right; and striking it out would produce the very inconsistency which it was meant to get rid of. The train of business, and the late turn which it had taken, had led him, he said, into deep meditation on it, and he would candidly state the result. A distinction had been set up, and urged, between the Northern and Southern States. He had hitherto considered this doctrine as heretical. He still thought the distinction groundless. He sees, however, that it is persisted in; and the Southern gentlemen will not be satisfied unless they see the way open to their gaining a majority in the public councils. The consequence of such a transfer of power from the maritime to the interior and landed interest, will, he foresees, be such an oppression to commerce, that he shall be obliged to vote for the vicious principle of equality in the second branch, in order to provide some defence for the Northern States against it. But to come more to the point, either this distinction is fictitious or real; if fictitious, let it be dismissed, and let us proceed with due confidence. If it be real, instead of attempting to blend incompatible things, let us at once take a friendly leave of each other. There can be no end of demands for security, if every particular interest is to be entitled to it. The Eastern States may claim it for their fishery, and for other objects, as the Southern States claim it for their peculiar objects. In this struggle between the two ends of the Union, what part ought the Middle States, in point of policy, to take? To join their Eastern brethren, according to his ideas. If the Southern States get the power into their hands, and be joined, as they will be, with the interior country, they will inevitably bring on a war with Spain for the Mississippi. This language is already held. The interior country, having no property nor interest exposed on the sea, will be little affected by such a war. He wished to know what security the Northern and Middle State
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077  
2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Southern

 
interior
 

Northern

 

distinction

 

interest

 

Middle

 

objects

 

security

 

Eastern


property

 

inhabitants

 

fifths

 

proceed

 

fictitious

 

principle

 
number
 

country

 

friendly

 

defence


confidence

 

dismissed

 

attempting

 

provide

 
things
 

incompatible

 

struggle

 
Mississippi
 

language

 
joined

inevitably
 
wished
 

affected

 

exposed

 

entitled

 

fishery

 

peculiar

 
demands
 
branch
 

brethren


policy

 
striking
 
produce
 

wealth

 

entire

 

proportion

 
inconsistency
 

business

 

numbers

 

whites