FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256  
257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   >>   >|  
(1.) That the legend of the dense forest by which the Mount was believed to have been surrounded existed, so far as we know, before the earliest occurrence of the Cornish name, and that it owes its origin entirely to a mistake which can be accounted for by documentary evidence. A legend told of Mont St. Michel had been transferred _ipsissimis verbis_ to St. Michael's Mount, and the monks of that priory repeated the story which they found in their chronicle to all who came to visit their establishment in Cornwall. They told the name, among others, to William of Worcester, and to prevent any incredulity on his part, they gave him chapter and verse from their chronicle, which he carefully jotted down in his diary.(96) (2.) We find that when the Cornish name first occurs, it lends itself, in one form, to a very natural interpretation, which does not give the meaning of "Hore rock in the wodd," but shows the name _Cara cowz in clowze_ to have been a literal rendering of the Latin name "Mons in tumba," originally the name of Mont St. Michel, but at an early date applied in charters to St. Michael's Mount. (3.) We find that the second form of the Cornish name, namely, _cara clowse in cowze_, may either be a merely metamorphic corruption of _cara cowz in clowze_, readily suggested and supported by the new meaning which it yielded of "gray rock in the wood;" or, even if we accept it as an original name, that it would be no more than a name framed by the Cornish-speaking monks of the Mount, in order to embody the same spurious tradition which had given rise to the name of "Hore rock in the wodd." I need hardly add that in thus arguing against Mr. Pengelly's conclusions, I do not venture to touch his geological arguments. St. Michael's Mount may have been united with the mainland; it may, for all we know, have been surrounded by a dense forest; and it may be perfectly possible geologically to fix the date when that forest was destroyed, and the Mount severed, so far as it is severed, from the Cornish coast. All I protest against is that any one of these facts could be proved, or even supported, by the Cornish name of the Mount, whether _cara cowz in clowze_, or _cara clowse in cowze_, or by the English name, communicated by William of Worcester, "the Hore rock in the wodd," or finally by the legend which gave rise to these names, and which, as can be proved by irrefragable evidence, was transplanted by mistake from the Norma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256  
257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cornish

 

clowze

 
legend
 

forest

 
Michael
 

chronicle

 

meaning

 
Worcester
 

William

 

Michel


supported

 

proved

 

clowse

 
surrounded
 

evidence

 

mistake

 
severed
 

framed

 

speaking

 

embody


yielded
 

corruption

 
accept
 
original
 

readily

 
suggested
 

metamorphic

 

protest

 

destroyed

 

perfectly


geologically

 

irrefragable

 

transplanted

 
finally
 

English

 

communicated

 

mainland

 

arguing

 

spurious

 

tradition


Pengelly

 

geological

 
arguments
 

united

 

venture

 

conclusions

 

priory

 

repeated

 

establishment

 
Cornwall