FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  
iii.) are nothing more than graphic representations of the ordinary systematic relationships of organisms, with a few hypothetical ancestral groups or forms thrown in to give the whole a genealogical turn. If the genealogical tree is truly represented by the natural system, it would seem that for each genus a single ancestral form must be postulated, for each group of genera a single more primitive form, and so in general for each of the higher classificatory categories, right up to the phylum. Species of one genus must be descended from a generic ancestral form, genera of one family from a single family _Urform_, and so on for the higher categories. This consequence was explicitly recognised by Haeckel. "Genera and families," he writes, "as the next highest systematic grades, are extinct species which have resolved themselves into a divergent bunch of forms (_Formenbueschel_)" (ii., p. 420). The archetype of the genus, family, order, class and phylum was thus conceived to have had at some past time a real existence. The natural system of classification is based upon a proper appreciation of the distinction between homological and analogical characters. Haeckel, following Darwin, naturally interprets the former as due to inheritance, the latter as due to adaptation, using these words, we may note, in their accepted meaning and not in the abstract empty sense he had previously attributed to them.[370] Similarly the "type of organisation," in von Baer's sense, was due to heredity, the "grade of differentiation" to adaptation. So far Haeckel merely emphasised what Darwin had already said in the _Origin of Species_. But by his statement of the "biogenetic law," and particularly by the clever use he made of it, Haeckel went a step beyond Darwin, and exercised perhaps a more direct influence upon evolutionary morphology than Darwin himself. Haeckel was not the original discoverer of the law of recapitulation. It happened that a few years before the publication of Haeckel's _General Morphology_, a German doctor, Fritz Mueller by name, stationed in Brazil, had been working on the development of Crustacea under the direct inspiration of Darwin's theory, and had published in 1864 a book[371] in which he showed that individual development gave a clue to ancestral history. He conceived that progressive evolution might take place in two different ways. "Descendants ... reach a new goal, either by deviating sooner or
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Haeckel

 

Darwin

 

ancestral

 

single

 

family

 

Species

 
phylum
 
genera
 

higher

 

development


direct

 

conceived

 

categories

 

genealogical

 

system

 

natural

 

adaptation

 

systematic

 

morphology

 
influence

differentiation

 

evolutionary

 

exercised

 

Origin

 

organisation

 

Similarly

 

heredity

 

original

 
biogenetic
 

statement


emphasised

 

clever

 

working

 

progressive

 

evolution

 
history
 

showed

 

individual

 

deviating

 

sooner


Descendants

 
General
 

Morphology

 

German

 

doctor

 

publication

 
recapitulation
 

happened

 

Mueller

 
inspiration