FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   >>   >|  
owth of trade with Arabia and India thereafter raised Coptos to great commercial prosperity; but in A.D. 292 its share in the rebellion against Diocletian led to an almost total devastation. It again appears, however, as a place of importance, and as the seat of a considerable Christian community, though the stream of traffic turned aside to the neighbouring K[=u]s. During part of the 7th century it was called Justinianopolis in honour of the emperor Justinian. The local god of Coptos, as of Khemmis (Akhm[=i]m, q.v.), was the ithyphallic Min; but in late times Isis was of equal importance in the city. Min was especially the god of the desert routes. Petrie's excavations on the site of the temple brought to light remains of all periods, the most remarkable objects being three very primitive limestone statues of the god with figures of an elephant, swords of sword-fish, sea-shells, &c., engraved upon them: there were also found some very peculiar terra-cottas of the Old Kingdom, and the decree of an Antef belonging to the latter part of the Middle Kingdom, deposing the monarch for siding with the king's enemy. COPTS, the early native Christians of Egypt and their successors of the Monophysite sect, now racially the purest representatives of the ancient Egyptians. The name is a Europeanized form, dating perhaps from the 14th century, of the Arabic Kibt (or Kubt), which, in turn, is derived from the Greek [Greek: Aiguptioi], "Egyptians" (the Copts in the Coptic language likewise style themselves [grahic], "people of Egypt," "Egyptians"). The limited application of the name is explained by the circumstances of the time when Mahomet sent forth his challenge to the world and 'Amr conquered Egypt (A.D. 627-641). At that time the population of Egypt was wholly Christian (except for a sprinkling of Jews, &c.), divided into two fiercely hostile sects, the Monophysites and the Melkites. The division was in great measure racial. The Melkites, adherents of the orthodox or court religion sanctioned by the council of Chalcedon, were mainly of foreign extraction, from the various Hellenistic races which peopled the Eastern Roman empire, while the bulk of the population, the true Egyptians, were Monophysite. Amongst the latter political aspirations, apart from religion, may be said not to have existed. It has generally been held that the Copts invited and aided the Moslems to seize the country in order that at all costs they
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Egyptians

 

population

 

religion

 

century

 
Monophysite
 

Kingdom

 

Christian

 

Melkites

 
Coptos
 

importance


grahic
 
people
 

limited

 

invited

 

Coptic

 

language

 

likewise

 

application

 

explained

 

Mahomet


circumstances
 

generally

 

racially

 

Aiguptioi

 

dating

 

country

 
Europeanized
 
ancient
 

representatives

 
Arabic

challenge

 

derived

 
purest
 

Moslems

 

existed

 
Chalcedon
 
aspirations
 

foreign

 

council

 

sanctioned


orthodox

 

political

 

extraction

 
empire
 

Amongst

 
Eastern
 

Hellenistic

 

peopled

 

adherents

 
racial