Williams.
[82] Berington. See his Life of Abeillard.
[83] Dr. John Gregory. Comparative View of the State and Faculties of
Man with those of the Animal World. See vol. ii. of Works, from page
100 to 114.
[84] Vernet's Theorie des Sentiments Agreables.
[85] V. Varieties of Literature, vol. i.
[86] Can it be true, that an English nobleman, in the 18th century,
won a bet by procuring a man to eat a cat alive?
[87] See Moore's Edward for the boy and larks, an excellent story for
children.
[88] Mem. de l'Acad. R. for the year 1742, p. 332.
[89] V. Middleton's Life of Cicero, vol. i. page 474.
[90] V. Le Palais de la Verite.--Madame de Genlis Veillees du Chateau.
[91] Sir Joshua Reynolds's Discourses. Dr. Darwin's Critical
Interludes in the Botanic Garden, and his chapter on Sympathy and
Imitation in Zoonomia.
[92] D'Alembert.
CHAPTER XI.
ON VANITY, PRIDE, AND AMBITION.
We shall not weary the reader by any common-place declamations upon
these moral topics. No great subtilty of distinction is requisite to
mark the differences between Vanity and Pride, since those differences
have been pointed out by every moralist, who has hoped to please
mankind by an accurate delineation of the failings of human nature.
Whatever distinctions exist, or may be supposed to exist, between the
characters in which pride or vanity predominates, it will readily be
allowed, that there is one thing in which they both agree--they both
receive pleasure from the approbation of others, and from their own.
We are disgusted with the vain man, when he intemperately indulges in
praise of himself, however justly he may be entitled to that praise,
because he offends against those manners which we have been accustomed
to think polite, and he claims from us a greater portion of sympathy
than we can possibly afford to give him. We are not, however, pleased
by the negligence with which the proud man treats us; we do not like
to see that he can exist in independent happiness, satisfied with a
cool internal sense of his own merits; he loses our sympathy, because
he does not appear to value it.
If we could give our pupils exactly the character we wish, what
degrees of vanity and pride should we desire them to have, and how
should we regulate these passions? Should we not desire, that their
ambition to excel might be sufficient to produce the greatest possible
exertions, directed to the best possible objects; that their opinio
|