page 148.--Perhaps
Gibbon had this excellent line of Mrs. Barbauld's in his memory:
"And pay a life of hardships with a line."
[94] See Peltier's state of Paris in the years 1795 and 1796.
[95] See Zoonomia, vol. i. p. 99.
[96] V. De Tott's Memoirs, p. 138, a note.
[97] V. Sympathy.
[98] V. Plutarch.
[99] Necker de l'Administration des Finances de la France, vol. i. p.
98.
[100] Cyropaedia, vol. ii. page 303.
CHAPTER XII.
BOOKS.
The first books which are now usually put into the hands of a child,
are Mrs. Barbauld's Lessons; they are by far the best books of the
kind that have ever appeared; those only who know the difficulty and
the importance of such compositions in education, can sincerely
rejoice, that the admirable talents of such a writer have been
employed in such a work. We shall not apologize for offering a few
remarks on some passages in these little books, because we are
convinced that we shall not offend.
Lessons for children from three to four years old, should, we think,
have been lessons for children from four to five years old; few read,
or ought to read, before that age.
"Charles shall have a pretty new lesson."
In this sentence the words pretty and new are associated; but they
represent ideas which ought to be kept separate in the mind of a
child. The love of novelty is cherished in the minds of children by
the common expressions that we use to engage them to do what we
desire. "You shall have a new whip, a new hat," are improper modes of
expression to a child. We have seen a boy who had literally twenty new
whips in one year, and we were present when his father, to comfort him
when he was in pain, went out to buy him a _new_ whip, though he had
two or three scattered about the room.
The description, in the first part of Mrs. Barbauld's Lessons, of the
naughty boy who tormented the robin, and who was afterwards supposed
to be eaten by bears, is more objectionable than any in the book: the
idea of killing is in itself very complex, and, if explained, serves
only to excite terror; and how can a child be made to comprehend why a
cat _should_ catch mice, and not kill birds? or why should this
species of honesty be expected from an animal of prey?
"I want my dinner."
Does Charles take it for granted, that what he eats is his own, and
that he _must_ have his dinner? These and similar expressions are
words of course; but young children should not be allowe
|