FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  
torpedo have greatly increased, but there is little evidence connecting these features with the performance of torpedoes in the present war. So far as known, the submarines have done most of their effective work at short ranges where hits were to be expected. And no one will ever know how many shots have missed. The great outstanding lesson thus far is the extraordinary destructiveness of the torpedoes that have found their mark. It would never have been believed two years ago that ships like the _Cressy_, _Aboukir_, and _Hogue_ would turn turtle a few minutes after a single blow from a torpedo. Still less would it have seemed possible to sink a _Lusitania_ in fifteen minutes. A torpedo might, of course, produce an extraordinary effect if it chanced to strike a boiler compartment or a magazine. But it does not appear that this happened in any one of the many disasters in question. It has been said that the German torpedoes carry an exceptionally heavy explosive charge, the extra weight having been gained by a sacrifice in speed and range. This may in part explain their effectiveness, but when all allowance is made for what we know or guess along this and similar lines, the fact remains that the torpedo has shown itself a weapon of vastly greater destructive power than the world has heretofore attributed to it. The story of the Dardanelles campaign has illustrated again the futility of attacking land fortifications by battleships. Attacks of this kind have never succeeded, and the temptation is strong to accept the theory that in planning these operations the British anticipated little or no resistance from those in command of the forts. It was conceivable that the forts could be passed--as were those at New Orleans and Mobile Bay by Farragut--but not that they could be reduced by the gun fire of ships. Information is lacking as to the damage actually done. It was probably greater than the defenders have admitted; but it evidently fell far short of silencing the forts. If the world needed a new demonstration of the power of forts to stand out against ships, we may put this down as one more lesson of the war. An important revelation of the war is the smoothness and rapidity with which large bodies of troops, with all their impedimenta--horses, artillery, etc.--have been transported by water. This has, of course, been possible only for Great Britain and her allies, and for them only because they have held unchallenged
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

torpedo

 

torpedoes

 

minutes

 

extraordinary

 

greater

 

lesson

 

battleships

 

strong

 

temptation

 
Attacks

succeeded
 
planning
 

impedimenta

 
anticipated
 

resistance

 
troops
 
British
 

allies

 

theory

 

fortifications


operations

 

accept

 
destructive
 
transported
 

vastly

 

weapon

 

artillery

 

heretofore

 

illustrated

 

bodies


futility

 

attacking

 

campaign

 

Dardanelles

 

attributed

 

horses

 

silencing

 
important
 

needed

 

evidently


defenders

 

admitted

 
remains
 

demonstration

 

unchallenged

 

Britain

 
rapidity
 
Orleans
 

Mobile

 
passed