FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   >>  
for granted on the one side and your philosophy for granted on the other, and then to prove their necessary connection. But it is, at any rate, important to see what was the nature of the philosophical assumptions implicitly taken for granted by Bentham. The 'rights of man' doctrine confounds a primary logical canon with a statement of fact. Every political theory must be based upon facts as well as upon logic. Any reasonable theory about politics must no doubt give a reason for inequality and a reason, too, for equality. The maxim that all men were, or ought to be, 'equal' asserts correctly that there must not be arbitrary differences. Every inequality should have its justification in a reasonable system. But when this undeniable logical canon is taken to prove that men actually are equal, there is an obvious begging of the question. In point of fact, the theorists immediately proceeded to disfranchise half the race on account of sex, and a third of the remainder on account of infancy. They could only amend the argument by saying that all men were equal in so far as they possessed certain attributes. But those attributes could only be determined by experience, or, as Bentham would have put it, by an appeal to 'utility.' It is illogical, said the anti-slavery advocate, to treat men differently on account of the colour of their skins. No doubt it is illogical if, in fact, the difference of colour does not imply a difference of the powers which fit a man for the enjoyment of certain rights. We may at least grant that the burden of proof should be upon those who would disfranchise all red-haired men. But this is because experience shows that the difference of colour does not mark a relevant difference. We cannot say, _a priori_, whether the difference between a negro and a white man may not be so great as to imply incapacity for enjoyment of equal rights. The black skin might--for anything a mere logician can say--indicate the mind of a chimpanzee. The case against slavery does not rest on the bare fact that negroes and whites both belong to the class 'man,' but on the fact that the negro has powers and sensibilities which fit him to hold property, to form marriages, to learn his letters, and so forth. But that fact is undeniably to be proved, not from the bare logic, but from observation of the particular case. Bentham saw with perfect clearness that sound political theory requires a basis of solid fact. The main pur
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   >>  



Top keywords:

difference

 

Bentham

 
account
 

rights

 
granted
 

colour

 

theory

 
reason
 

inequality

 

enjoyment


experience

 

powers

 

slavery

 
illogical
 

disfranchise

 

attributes

 
political
 

logical

 

reasonable

 

letters


burden
 

haired

 
proved
 
perfect
 

clearness

 
requires
 

observation

 

undeniably

 

priori

 

chimpanzee


sensibilities

 

belong

 

negroes

 
logician
 

whites

 

marriages

 

incapacity

 

property

 

relevant

 

confounds


primary

 

statement

 
politics
 

asserts

 

correctly

 

arbitrary

 

equality

 

doctrine

 

implicitly

 
connection